Skip to main content
Log in

The analytic geometry of genetics: part I: the structure, function, and early evolution of Punnett squares

  • Published:
Archive for History of Exact Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A square tabular array was introduced by R. C. Punnett in (1907) to visualize systematically and economically the combination of gametes to make genotypes according to Mendel’s theory. This mode of representation evolved and rapidly became standardized as the canonical way of representing like problems in genetics. Its advantages over other contemporary methods are discussed, as are ways in which it evolved to increase its power and efficiency, and responded to changing theoretical perspectives. It provided a natural visual decomposition of a complex problem into a number of inter-related stages. This explains its computational and conceptual power, for one could simply “read off” answers to a wide variety of questions simply from the “right” visual representation of the problem, and represent multiple problems, and multiple layers of problems in the same diagram. I relate it to prior work on the evolution of Weismann diagrams by Griesemer and Wimsatt (What Philosophy of Biology Is, Martinus-Nijhoff, the Hague, 1989), and discuss a crucial change in how it was interpreted that midwifed its success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

I. Sources for Punnett squares and other diagrams

  • Babcock, E.B., and R.E.Clausen. 1918. Genetics in relation to agriculture. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W., R.C. Punnett, and E. Saunders. 1906. Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity (report to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society, III), 2–11. London: The Royal Society [p.152-161 in Bateson’s collected papers].

  • Bateson, W.W. (1913, third impression with additions, 2 earlier printings in 1909). Mendel’s principles of heredity. London: Cambridge University Press.

  • Baur Erwin. (1914) Einführung in die experimentelle vererbungslehre. Verlag von der Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut W. (1993) Taking the naturalistic turn: Or how real philosophy of science is done. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, William E. 1916. Genetics and eugenics. Cambridge: Harvard (4 editions through 1930).

  • Conklin, E. 1915. Heredity and environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press (5 editions through 1923).

  • Crew F.A.E. (1925) Animal genetics: An introduction to the science of animal breeding. Oliver and Boyd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbishire A.D. (1911) Breeding and the Mendelian discovery. Cassell and Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C.D., and K. Mather. 1949. The elements of genetics. London: Allen and Unwin (reprinted 1969 by Schocken Books, New York).

  • Dendy A. (1912) Outlines of evolutionary biology. Appleton, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S. (1985) Principles of embryology. Sunderland, Sinauer

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell M.P. (1978) The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert S. (1910) The first principles of heredity. A & C Black, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben L. (1946) An introduction to mathematical genetics. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, G. 1866. Experiments in Plant-Hybridization (English trans: 1902). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Morgan, T.H. 1913, 1914. Heredity and sex, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press (pagination from 1914 ed.).

  • Morgan T.H. (1916) A critique of the theory of evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T.H., A.H. Sturtevant, H.J. Muller, and C.B. Bridges. 1915. The mechanism of mendelian heredity. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

  • Punnett R.C. (1907) Mendelism. 2nd ed. MacMillan and Co., London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Punnett, R.C. 1911. Mendelism, 3rd ed. London: MacMillan and Co. (5 editions through 1927).

  • Schank, J.C., and T.J. Koehnle. 2007. Modeling complex biobehavioral systems. In Modeling Biology: Structures, Behaviors, Evolution ed. M.D. Laubichler, and G.B. Muller, 219–244. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Sinnott E., Dunn L.C. (1939) Principles of genetics, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, E., L.C. Dunn, and T. Dobzhansky. 1950. Principles of genetics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Sturtevant, A.H., and G. Beadle. 1939. An introduction to genetics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

  • Walter, H. 1913. Genetics, 1st ed. New York: MacMillan (1913, 1917 reprint).

  • Wilson, E.B. 1896. The cell in development and inheritance. London: Macmillan Co.

  • Wilson E.B. (1925) The cell in development and heredity, 3rd ed. MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson James. (1916) A manual of Mendelism. A.&C. Black, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 1987. False Models as means to Truer Theories. In Neutral Models in Biology ed. M. Nitecki, and A. Hoffman, 23–55. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Wimsatt, W.C., and J.C. Schank. 1993. Modelling—A Primer (or: the crafty art of making, exploring, extending, transforming, tweaking, bending, disassembling, questioning, and breaking models). Now public domain through BioQUEST library of strategic simulations.

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 2007. Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

II. Other references

  • Allchin, D. 1991. Resolving disagreement in science: The Ox-Phos controversy, 1961–1978, Ph.D. dissertation, Committee on the Conceptual Foundations of Science, The University of Chicago.

  • Basalla G. (1988) The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R., Richerson P (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, E.A. 1967. The gene: A critical history. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

  • Clarke A., Fujimura J. (1992) The right tool f or the job. Princeton University Press., Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman W.L. (1970) Conservative thought in science: the case of William Bateson. Centaurus 15: 228–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darden L. (1991) Theory construction in science: Strategies from Mendelian genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C.D. 1937. Recent advances in cytology. Philadelphia: The Blakiston Co. (reprinted, 1988, by The Garland Publishing Co., New York).

  • Gould, S.J., and R.C. Lewontin. 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 205: 581–598.

  • Griesemer, J.R. 1994. Image and argument: Towards a visual logic of weismannism. Unpublished talk, conference on visualization in science, Galveston Medical Center, Galveston TX, April 30, 1994.

  • Griesemer, J.R., and W.C. Wimsatt. 1989. Picturing Weismannism: A case study in conceptual evolution. What Philosophy of Biology Is (essays for David Hull), ed. M. Ruse, 75–137. The Hague: Martinus-Nijhoff.

  • Hull D. (1988) The processes of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler R. (1994) Lords of the fly. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R., and R.C. Lewontin. 1985. The dialectical biologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Provine, W. 1971. The origins of theoretical population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 7, ed. K. Gunderson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Tufte E. (1983) The quantitative display of visual information. Graphics Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 1981. Robustness, reliability and overdetermination. In Scientific inquiry and the social sciences, ed. M. Brewer, and B. Collins, 124–163. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 1987. False models as means to truer theories. In Neutral models in biology, ed. M. Nitecki, and A. Hoffman, 23–55. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 1991. Taming the dimensions–visualizations in science. In PSA-1990, vol. 2, ed. M. Forbes, L. Wessels, and A. Fine, 111–135. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association.

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 1992. Golden generalities and co-opted anomalies: Haldane vs. Muller and the Drosophila group on the theory and practice of linkage mapping. In Fisher, Haldane, Muller, and Wright: Founders of the modern mathematical theory of evolution, ed. S. Sarkar, 107–166. Dordrecht: Martinus-Nijhoff.

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 1999. Genes, memes, and cultural inheritance, invited contribution for April 1999Biology and Philosophy special issue on influence of R. C. Lewontin. 14: 279–310.

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 2001. Generative entrenchment and the developmental systems approach to evolutionary processes. In Cycles of contingency:Developmental systems and evolution, ed. S. Oyama, R. Gray, and P. Griffiths, 219–237. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Wimsatt, W.C., and J.R. Griesemer. 2007. Reproducing entrenchments to scaffold culture: The central role of development in cultural evolution. InIntegrating evolution and development, ed. R. Sansom, and R. Brandon, 227–324. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. C. Wimsatt.

Additional information

Communicated by: Manfred Laubichler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wimsatt, W.C. The analytic geometry of genetics: part I: the structure, function, and early evolution of Punnett squares. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 66, 359–396 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-012-0096-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-012-0096-7

Keywords

Navigation