Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Latin American ethnopedology: A vision of its past, present, and future

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethnopedology is the study of local knowledge of soil and land management in an ecological perspective. It is an emerging hybrid discipline that is a component of ethnoecology and stands to offer much for land-based studies. This paper reviews the field of ethnopedology in Latin America and compares some of the many case studies from that region. Various literature sources are considered, including the ethnographical, ethnohistorical, archaeological, geographical, agronomic, ethnoecological, and development studies. Our review invokes the theory of ethnoecology that focuses on the linkages between kosmos (beliefs and symbolic representations), corpus (environmental knowledge), and praxis (the set of practical operations through which the material appropriation of nature takes place) of local land-users. The main topics covered are the ethnohistorical and archaeological evidence of ethnopedology, local soil and land classification, local land management systems, local perceptions and beliefs of soil and land resources, and local soil fertility management. After analysing past and present research trends, recommendations are given on how ethnopedological studies can contribute to enhance sustainable land use and management in Latin America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. Codex Fejérváry-Mayer (1964-1967). In Antigüedades de México. Lord Kingsborough comp (pp. 185-276). Mexico: Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito PÚblico.

  • Balée, W. (1994). Footprints of the Forest: Ka'apor Ethnobotany —the Historical Ecology of Plant Utilization by an Amazonian People. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols, N. (1988). “Etnoedafología Purhépecha.” México Indígena VI(24): 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols, N. (2003). Symbolism, Knowledge and Management of Soil and Land Resources in Indigenous Communities: Ethnopedology at Global, Regional and Local Scales. Ghent: University of Ghent Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols, N. and J. A. Zinck (2000). Ethnopedology in a Worldwide Perspective: An Annotated Bibliography. Enschede, The Netherlands: ITC. ITC Publication Number 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols, N. and J. A. Zinck (2003a). “Ethnopedology: A worldwide view on the soil knowledge of local people.” Geoderma 111(3–4): 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols, N. and J. A. Zinck (2003b). “Soil moves and behaves: Indigenous discourse on sustainable land management in Pichátaro, Pátzcuaro Basin, Mexico.” Geografiska Annaler-A 85(3–4): 229–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, E. (1996). “Managing nutrients in the Orinoco floodplain.” Nature and Resources 32(4): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, E. and M. T. Trejo (2003). “Implications of local soil knowledge for integrated soil management in Latin America.” Geoderma 111(3–4): 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellón, M. R. (1995). “Farmers' knowledge and sustainable agroecosystem management: An operational definition and an example from Chiapas, Mexico.” Human Organization 54(3): 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Taylor and Francis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke (2000). “Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management.” Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, D. M. (1996). “Learning local knowledge of soils: Improving linkages between land users and extension personnel.” Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 3(1): 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocco, G. (1991). “Traditional knowledge for soil conservation in central Mexico.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 46(5): 346–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers, J. H. A. M. (1993). “Rural people's response to soil fertility decline: The Adja case (Benin).” Wageningen Agricultural University Papers (93-94): 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, H. (2001). Exploring Agrodiversity: Issues, Cases, and Methods in Biodiversity Conservation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buol, S. W., F. D. Hole, R. J, McCracken, and R. J. Southard (1997). Soil Genesis and Classification. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, M. D. (1964). “The Chinampas of Mexico.” Scientific American (211): 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, P. (2004). “Sub-irrigation in wetland agriculture: Evidence from the Chinampas of Mexico.” Agriculture and Human Values 21(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, W. M. (1970). “Aboriginal drained-field cultivation in the Americas.” Science 169(3946): 647–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, W. M. (1980). “Latin America.” In G. A. Klee (ed.), World Systems of Traditional Resource Management (pp. 217–244). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, W. M. (2001). Cultivated Landscapes of Native Amazonia and the Andes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (1994). In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (1996a). “Constructing natures: Symbolic ecology and social practice. Anthropological perspectives.” In P. Descola and G. Pàlsson (eds.), Nature and Society (pp. 82–102). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (1996b). The Spears of Twilight: Life and Death in the Amazon Jungle. London: Flamingo (HarperCollins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donkin, R. A. (1979). Agricultural Terracing in Aboriginal New World. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, Volume 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchaufour, P. (1998). Handbook of Pedology: Soils, Vegetation and Environment. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, N. P. (1990). “The implication of folk soil taxonomies for agricultural change in Middle America.” Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers (17/18): 243–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, C. L. (1993). “The social organization of prehispanic raised field agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin.” In V. L. Scarborough and B. L. Isaac (eds.), Economic Aspects of Water Management in the Prehispanic World (pp. 369–426). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, C. L. (1999). “Neo-environmental determinism and agrarian 'collapse' in Andean prehistory.” Antiquity 73: 634–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, C. L. and K. L. Candler (1989). “Raised fields and sustainable agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin of Peru.” In J. O. Browder (ed.), Fragile Lands of Latin America: Strategies for Sustainable Development (pp. 230–248). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, B. B. (1998). Mexican Rural Development and the Plumed Serpent. Technology and Maya Cosmology in the Tropical Forest of Campeche, Mexico. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaka, S. (1994). “Incorporating farmers' knowledge in international rice research.” In D. M. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer and D. W. Brokensha (eds.), The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge Systems (pp. 124–139). IT Studies in Indigenous Knowledge and Development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., F. Berkes, and C. Folke (1993). “Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation.” Ambio 22(2-3): 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gade, D. A. (1999). Nature and Culture in the Andes. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • German, L. (2003). “Historical contingencies in the coevolution of environment and livelihood: Contributions to the debate on Black Earth.” Geoderma 111(3-4): 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., L. Haumaier, G. Guggenberger, and W. Zech (2001). “The 'Terra Preta' phenomenon: A model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics.” Naturwissenschaften 88: 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Pompa, A. and A. Kaus (1990). “Traditional management of tropical forests in Mexico.” In A. B. Anderson (ed.), Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps toward Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rain Forest (pp. 45–64). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. (2003). “Exploring farmer knowledge of soil processes in organic coffee systems of Chiapas, Mexico.” Geoderma 111(3-4): 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammen van der, M. C. (1992). Managing the World: Nature and Society by the Yukuna of the Colombian Amazonia. Estudios de la Amazonia Colombiana (4). Bogotá: Tropenbos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort, B. and D. Millar (1994). “Constructing diversity: The active role of rural people in maintaining and enhancing biodiversity.” Etnoecólogica 2(3): 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger, M. J., J. B. Petersen, and E. G. Neves (1999). “Village size and permanence in Amazonia: Two archaeological examples from Brazil.” Latin American Antiquity 10(4): 353–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. B. (1989). “Indigenous soil management in the Amazon Basin: Some implications for development.” In J.O. Browder (ed.), Fragile Lands of Latin America: Strategies for Sustainable Development (pp. 166–181). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. B. and D. A. Posey (1989). “Preliminary results on soil management techniques of the Kayapó Indians.” Advances in Economic Botany 7: 174–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licona Vargas, A. L., C. A. Ortiz-Solorio, D. Pájaro-Huertas, and R. Ortega Packza (1992). “Metodología para el levantamiento de tierras campesinas a nivel regional en ejidos del centro de Veracruz, México.” Agrociencia. Serie Agua-Suelo-Clima 3(4): 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Austin, A. (1994). Tamoanchan y Tlalocan. Mexico City Fondo de Cultura Económica. Sección de Obras de Antropología.

  • McEwan, C., C. Barreto, and E. Neves (eds.) (2001). Unknown Amazon: Culture in Nature in Ancient Brazil. London: British Museum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers, B. J. (1996 [1971]). Amazonia: Man and Culture in a Counterfeit Paradise. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. J. (1993). “Ecological classification among the Chinantec and Mixe of Oaxaca, Mexico.” Etnoecológica 1(2): 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarity, J.R. (1968). “Floating gardens (Chinampas): Agriculture in the old lakes of Mexico.” América Indígena 28(2): 461–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarea, V. G. (ed.) (1999). Ethnoecology. Situated Knowledge/Located Lives. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeijer, D. and V. Mazzucato (2003). “Moving beyond indigenous soil taxonomies: Local theories of soils for sustainable development.” Geoderma 111(3-4): 403–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortíz Solorio, C. A., D. Pájaro-Huertas, and V. M. Ordaz-Chaparro (1989). “Manual para la Cartografía de Clases de Tierras Campesinas.” Cuadernos de Edafología (15): 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortíz Solorio, C. A. and M. C. Gutierrez-Castorena (2001). “Mexican ethnopedology: The experience of soil mapping.” In Science and tradition: roots and wings for development (pp. 89–106). Brussels: UNESCO/Académie Royale des Sciences d'Outre-Mer, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Östberg, W. and C. Reij (1998). “Culture and local knowledge: Their roles in soil and water conservation.” In H. P. Blume, H. Eger, E. Fleischhauer, A. Hebel, C. Reij, and K. G. Steiner (eds.), Towards Sustainable Land Use: Furthering Cooperation between People and Institutions (pp. 1349–1358). Advances in GeoEcology 31, Vol. 1. Reiskirchen: CATENA Verlag/ISSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. (1992). “Forest islands and Kayapó resource management in Amazonia: A reappraisal of the Apêtê.” American Anthropologist 94: 406–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payton, R. W., J. J. F. Barr, A. Martin, P. Sillitoe, J. F. Deckers, J. W. Gowing, N. Habtibu, S. B. Naseem, M. Tenywa, and M. I. Zuberi (2003). “Contrasting approaches to integrating indigenous knowledge about soils and scientific soil survey in East Africa and Bangladesh.” Geoderma 111(3-4): 355–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peñafiel, E. (1885). Nombres Geográficos de México. Mexico City: Sociedad Mexicana de Geografía y Estadística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. A. (1985). “Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: The case of the Kayapó Indians of the Brazilian Amazon.” Agroforestry Systems 3: 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. A. (2002). “Upsetting the sacred balance: Can the study of indigenous knowledge reflect connectedness?” In P. Sillitoe, A. Bicker, and J. Pottier (eds.), Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge (pp. 24–42). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulido, J. S. and G. Bocco (2003). “The Traditional farming system of a Mexican indigenous community: The case of Nuevo San Juan de Parangaricutiro, Michoacán, Mexico.” Geoderma 111(3-4): 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffles, H. (2002). In Amazonia: A Natural History. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichel-Dolmatoff (1976). “Cosmology as ecological analysis: A view from the rain forest.” Man (N.S.) II: 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, S. and J. San Martin (1993). “Agroecología y saber campesino en la conservación de suelos.” Agroecología. Vol. 1: Cochabamba: Universidad Mayor de San Simon/AGRUCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, S., J. San Martin, and N. Tapia (1996). “Andean concept of life and cosmovision.” In B. Haverkort, W. Hiemstra, D. Millar and S. Rist (eds.), Compas: Platform for Intercultural Dialogue on Cosmovision and Agri-Culture (pp. 13–19). Leusden, The Netherlands: ETC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1997). “The soft side of land: Socio-economic sustainability of land use systems.” ITC Journal 1997 (3/4).

  • Roosevelt, A. C. (1989). “Resource management in Amazonia before the conquest: Beyond ethnographic projection.” Advances in Economic Botany 7: 30–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, A. C., M. Lima da Costa, C. Lopes Machado, M. Michab, N. Mercier, H. Valladas, J. Feathers, W. Barnett, M. Imazio da Silveira, A. Henderson, J. Sliva, B. Chernoff, D. S. Reese, J. A. Holman, N. Toth, and K. Schick (1996). “Paleoindian Cave dwellers in the Amazon: The peopling of the Americas.” Science 272: 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanabria, O. L. (1986). “El uso y manejo forestal en la comunidad de Xul, en el sur de Yucatán.” Etnoflora Yucatanense. Vol. 2. Mexico: INIREB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandor, J. A. and N. S. Eash (1991). “Significance of ancient agricultural soils for long-term agronomic studies and sustainable agriculture research.” Agronomy Journal 83: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandor, J. A. and N. S. Eash (1995). “Ancient agricultural soils in the Andes of Southern Peru.” Soil Science Society of America Journal 59(1): 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandor, J. A. and L. Furbee (1996). “Indigenous knowledge and classification of soils in the Andes of Southern Peru.” Soil Science Society of America Journal 60(5): 1502–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, A. H. (1989). Tierra configurada: investigaciones de los vestigios de agricultura precolombina en tierras inundables costeras, México. Mexico City: CNCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe, P. (1996). A Place against Time: Land and Environment in the Papua New Guinea Highlands. Amsterdam: Hardwood Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe, P. (1998). “Knowing the land: Soil and land resource evaluation and indigenous knowledge.” Soil Use and Management 14: 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe, P. (2002). “Globalizing indigenous knowledge.” In P. Sillitoe, A. Bicker, and J. Pottier (eds.), Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge (pp. 108–138). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe, P., A. Bicker, and J. Pottier (eds.) (2002). Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talawar, S. and R. E. Rhoades (1998). “Scientific and local classification and management of soils.” Agriculture and Human Values (15): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terán, S. and C. Rasmussen (1994). La Milpa de los Mayas: La Agricultura de los Mayas Prehispánicos y Actuales en el Noroeste de Yucatán. Merida: DANIDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, V. M. (1992a). “What is ethnoecology? Origins, scope and implications of a rising discipline.” Etnoecológica 1(1): 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, V. M. (1992b). “Pátzcuaro's lesson: Nature, production and culture in an indigenous region of Mexico.” In M. E. Oldfield and J. Alcorn (eds,), Biodiversity, Culture and Ecodevelopment (pp. 147–171). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, V. M. (2002). “Ethnoecology: A conceptual framework for the study of indigenous knowledge on nature.” In J. R. Stepp, F. S. Wyndham, and R. Zarger (eds.), Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity: proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology (pp. 511–522). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, J. M. (1989). “Agricultural terraces in Peru's Colca Valley: Promises and problems of ancient technology.” In J. O. Browder (ed.), Fragile Lands of Latin America: Strategies for Sustainable Development (pp. 209–229). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, J. M. (1994). Las Chacras de Coporaque: Andenería y Riego en el Valle del Colca. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, N. E. Jr. (1978). “Ecological imagery and cultural adaptability: The Canelos Quichua of Eastern Ecuador.” American Anthropologist 80: 836–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, G. (1987). Good Farmers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. J. (1975). “Aztec soil science.” Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, UNAM 7: 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. J. (1980). “Pictorial representation of soils in the Valley of Mexico: Evidence of the Códice Vergara.” Geoscience and Man XXI (March): 51–62.

  • Williams, B. J. (1994). “Sixteenth century Nahua soil classes and rural settlement in Tepetlaoztoc.” Proceedings of the 15th World Congress of Soil Science, Acapulco, Mexico (6a) (pp. 359–366). Mexico: ISSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. J. and C. A. Ortíz-Solorio (1981). “Middle American folk soil taxonomy.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71(3): 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. (1999). “Local soil knowledge: A tool for sustainable land management.” Society and Natural Resources 12(2): 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. (2001). “Why context matters: Local soil knowledge and management among an indigenous peasantry on the Lower Amazon floodplain, Brazil.” Etnoecológica 5(7): 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. and J. Sandor (2003). “Preface to the Geoderma special issue on ethnopedology — 'local soil knowledge: Insights, applications, and challenges.'” Geoderma 111(3-4): 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, W. I. and J. M. McCann (1999). “The anthropogenic origin and persistence of Amazonian Dark Earths.” Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers Yearbook 25: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. (1994a). “Transforming Colquepata wetlands: Landscapes of knowledge and practice in Andean agriculture.” In W. P. Mitchell and D. Guillet (eds.), Irrigation at High Altitudes: The Social Organization of Water Control Systems in the Andes (pp. 115–140). Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. (1994b). “Local soil knowledge: Answering basic questions in highland Bolivia.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49(1): 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. (1996). Changing Fortunes: Biodiversity and Peasant Livelihood in the Peruvian Andes. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizumbo, D. and P. Colunga (1982). Los huaves: la apropiación de los recursos naturales. Sociología Rural. Mexico City: UACH.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Michigan State University, 315 Natural Science Building, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1115, USA

    Antoinette M. G. A. WinklerPrins

  2. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico

    Narciso Barrera-Bassols

Authors
  1. Antoinette M. G. A. WinklerPrins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Narciso Barrera-Bassols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoinette M. G. A. WinklerPrins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WinklerPrins, A.M.G.A., Barrera-Bassols, N. Latin American ethnopedology: A vision of its past, present, and future. Agriculture and Human Values 21, 139–156 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000029405.37237.c8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000029405.37237.c8

Search

Navigation