A Note on the Linguistic (In)Determinacy in the Legal Context
This paper discusses linguistic vagueness in the context of a semantically restricted domain of legal language. It comments on selected aspects of vagueness found in contemporary English normative legal texts and on terminological problems related to vagueness and indeterminacy both in the legal domain and language in general. The discussion is illustrated with selected corpus examples of vagueness in English legal language and attempts to show problems of the relation between vagueness and ambiguity in the context of legal institutionalised systems.
The discussion also evokes theoretical issues which pertain to the relation between legal texts and their contexts, the problem of how linguistic forms acquire their contextual meaning and how linguistic expressions are disambiguated. These issues are further related to the post-Gricean theory of relevance, its inferential model of communication, and the interplay between the linguistic code and inferential processes in (specialised) communication.
References
Asprey, Michele. 2003. Plain Language for Lawyers (3rd ed) Sydney: The Federation Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay, Jan Engberg, Maurizio Gotti, and Dorothee Heller (eds.) 2005. Vagueness in Normative Texts. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Ssusan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, Language and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding Utterances. An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1989. "Linguistic form and pragmatic interpretation: the explicit and the implicit" In: The Pragmatics of Style, edited by Leo Hickey, 28-51. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755792Search in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754603Search in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2004. "Explicature and semantics" In Semantics: A Reader, edited by Steven Davis & Brendan S. Gillon, 817-845. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2009. "The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and Limits of Explicit Communication" International Review of Pragmatics 1 (1): 35-62, doi: 10.1163/187731009X455839.10.1163/187731009X455839Search in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn & George Powell. 2006. "Relevance Theory—New Directions and Developments" In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith, 341-360. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0016Search in Google Scholar
Cao, Deborah. 2007. "Inter-lingual uncertainty in bilingual and multilingual law" Journal of Pragmatics 39: 69-83, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.005.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.005Search in Google Scholar
Conte, Amadeo Giovanni & Paolo Di Lucia. 2009. (this volume). "Pragmatic Ambiguity: The Thetic Function of Modality". Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5.2: 191-199, doi: 10.2478/v10016-009-0009-7.10.2478/v10016-009-0009-7Search in Google Scholar
Culver, Keith C. 2004. "Varieties of Vagueness" University of Toronto Law Journal 54 (1): 109-127, doi: 10.1353/tlj.2004.0002.10.1353/tlj.2004.0002Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Martin. 2003. "Philosophy of language" In The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy 2nd ed., edited by Nicholas Bunnin & Eric P. Tsui-James, 90-146. Oxford: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/9780470996362.ch5.10.1002/9780470996362.ch5Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Martin. 2006. "Foundational Issues in the Philosophy of Language" In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, edited by Michael Devitt and Richard Hanley, 19-40. Oxford: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/9780470757031.ch1.10.1002/9780470757031.ch1Search in Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy A. O. 2000. Vagueness in Law. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268406.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy A. O. 2002. "Law and Language", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2002 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/law-language/ (accessed January 2009). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/law-language/Search in Google Scholar
Felkins, Leon. 1998. Understanding Vagueness. An online article available at http://perspicuity.net/paradox/vagueness.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Felkins, Leon. 2004. Some Consequences of Ambiguity and Vagueness. An online article available at http://perspicuity.net/paradox/vag-cons.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Franken, Nathalie. 1997. "Vagueness and approximation in relevance theory" Journal of Pragmatics 28: 135-151, doi 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00082-3.Search in Google Scholar
Fredsted, Elin. 1998. "On semantic and pragmatic ambiguity" Journal of Pragmatics 30: 527-541, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00029-0.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00029-0Search in Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. 1996. The Language Connection. Philosophy and Linguistics. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. 1998. Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Roy & George Wolf (eds.) 1998. Integrational Linguistics: A First Reader. Oxford: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Uuniversity Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar
Hutton, Christopher. 1996. "Law Lessons for Linguists? Accountability and Acts of Professional Classification", Language and Communication 16 (3): 205-14. Reprinted in Roy Harris and George Wolf (eds.) (1998), 294-304, doi: 10.1016/0271-5309(96)00010-9.10.1016/0271-5309(96)00010-9Search in Google Scholar
Katz, Jerald. 1977. Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A study of the contribution of sentence meaning to speech acts. New York: Crowell.Search in Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth. 1977. Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Klinge, Alex. 1992. Legal Discourse and Modality. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Search in Google Scholar
Lauchman, Richard. 2001-2005. Plain Language. A handbook for writers in the U.S. Government. Available at http://www.lauchmangroup.com/PDFfiles/PLHandbook.PDFSearch in Google Scholar
Łozowski, Przemysław. 2000. Vagueness in Language. From truth-conditional synonymy to un-conditional polysemy. Lublin: UMCS.Search in Google Scholar
Ludlow, Peter. 2005. "Contextualism and the New Linguistic Turn in Epistemology". In Contextualism in Philosophy, edited by Gerhard Preyer & George Peter, 11-50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mowat, Christine. 1999. A Plain Language Handbook for Legal Writers. Scarborough, ON: Carssell.Search in Google Scholar
Myrczek, Ewa. 2004. (MS). Equivalence in Legal Translation, PhD Dissertation, University of Silesia, Poland.Search in Google Scholar
Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2000. Zagadnienie nieostrości. Warszawa: Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii UW.Search in Google Scholar
Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2005. "O nieostrości i niewyraźności" Ruch Filozoficzny 2: 229-234.Search in Google Scholar
Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2006. Rodzaje naturalne. Rozważania z filozofii języka. Warszawa: Semper.Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Radolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1992. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615382Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, Stanley. 1973. Drafting: Its application to conveyancing and commercial documents. London: Butterworths.Search in Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1958. "The Status of Linguistics as a Science" (1929), Reprinted in: Edward Sapir Culture, Language and Personality, edited by David G. Mandelbaum. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, doi: 10.2307/409588.10.2307/409588Search in Google Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen. 2006. "Vagueness" In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, edited by Michael Devitt and Richard Hanley, 225-243. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631231424.2006.00014.xSearch in Google Scholar
Searle, John, R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stewart 2006. Vagueness in Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280391.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence M. 2004. "Pernicious ambiguity in contracts and statutes" Chicago-Kent Law Review 9 (3): 859-888.Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Tałasiewicz, Mieszko. 2002. "Pragmatyczna koncepcja nieostrości" Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 1: 101-113.Search in Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael, 2000, "Legal Statute and Integrational Linguistics: Determining the Meaning of Theft". A paper delivered at the Sociolinguistic Symposium, Bristol UK, April 2000, available online at http://artsweb.bham.ac.uk/MToolan/integrationtheft.html (accessed June 2008). http://artsweb.bham.ac.uk/MToolan/integrationtheft.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1991. "An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in English Contract Law" Hermes: Journal of Linguistics 6: 65-90.10.7146/hjlcb.v4i6.21456Search in Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1995. "Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law" Journal of Pragmatics 23: 31-53, doi: 10.1016/03782166(94)00034-C.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Christopher. 2005. Tradition and Change in Legal English. Verbal Constructions in Prescriptive Texts. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 2004. "Relevance Theory" In Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Lawrence R. Horn & Gregory Ward, 607-632. Oxford: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/9780470756959.ch27.10.1002/9780470756959.ch27Search in Google Scholar
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona. 2001 (MS). Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Acts in English Legal Texts. PhD dissertation, University of Lodz, Poland.Search in Google Scholar
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona. 2005. "English legal texts in translation—the relevance-theoretic approach" Relevance Studies in Poland. 2: 169-181.Search in Google Scholar
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona. 2008. "The Relevance of Vague Expressions in the Law" Research in Language 6: 167-187.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Qiao. 1998. "Fuzziness—vagueness—generality—ambiguity". Journal of Pragmatics 29: 13-31, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00014-3.10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00014-3Search in Google Scholar
This content is open access.
