Abstract
T. Govier's description of ‘conductive argument’ and 'A priori analogy' is taken as a start to investigate non-deductive argumentation. It is here argued, that the nature of those types can be better understood when taking up a dynamic view (in addition to the usual structural view). The concepts of ‘frame’ and ‘position’ are constructed in order to establish such a twofold approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Govier, Trudy: 1987, Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Foris, Dordrecht.
Govier, Trudy: 1992, A Practical Study of Argument, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, Ca.
Reed, Michael: 1992, Instructor's Manual to Accompany Govier's Practical Study on Argument, Wadsworth, Belmont, Ca.
Russell, Bertrand: 1967, The Autobiography of Bertrand RussellVol. I (1872-1914), Allan & Unwin, London.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1969, Tractatus Logico Philosophicus, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1969, Über Gewißheit. On Certainty, Blackwell, Oxford.
Wohlrapp, Harald: 1989, 'Über nicht-deduktive Argumente', in Peter Klein (ed.), Praktische Logik, Vandenhock, Göttingen.
Wohlrapp, Harald: 1995a, 'Die diskursive Tendenz', in Harald Wohlrapp (ed.) Wege der Argumenta-tionsforschung, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, pp. 395-415.
Wohlrapp, Harald: 1995b, 'Resolving the Riddle of the Nondeductive Argumentation Schemes', in Van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol II, pp. 55-62.
Wohlrapp, Harald: 1996, 'Heterogenität als argumentationstheoretisches Problem', in Harm Paschen and Lothar Wigger (eds.), Schulautonomie als Entscheidungsproblem, Deutscher Studienverlag, Weinheim, pp. 43-57.
Wohlrapp, Harald: 1997, 'Frames and Positions: On Grounding Argumentation Theory Pragmatically', in James Klumpp et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth SCA/AFA Conference at Alta 1997, Forthcoming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wohlrapp, H. A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes. Argumentation 12, 341–350 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007791211241
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007791211241