Skip to main content
Log in

A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

T. Govier's description of ‘conductive argument’ and 'A priori analogy' is taken as a start to investigate non-deductive argumentation. It is here argued, that the nature of those types can be better understood when taking up a dynamic view (in addition to the usual structural view). The concepts of ‘frame’ and ‘position’ are constructed in order to establish such a twofold approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Govier, Trudy: 1987, Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govier, Trudy: 1992, A Practical Study of Argument, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Michael: 1992, Instructor's Manual to Accompany Govier's Practical Study on Argument, Wadsworth, Belmont, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1967, The Autobiography of Bertrand RussellVol. I (1872-1914), Allan & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1969, Tractatus Logico Philosophicus, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1969, Über Gewißheit. On Certainty, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlrapp, Harald: 1989, 'Über nicht-deduktive Argumente', in Peter Klein (ed.), Praktische Logik, Vandenhock, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlrapp, Harald: 1995a, 'Die diskursive Tendenz', in Harald Wohlrapp (ed.) Wege der Argumenta-tionsforschung, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, pp. 395-415.

  • Wohlrapp, Harald: 1995b, 'Resolving the Riddle of the Nondeductive Argumentation Schemes', in Van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol II, pp. 55-62.

  • Wohlrapp, Harald: 1996, 'Heterogenität als argumentationstheoretisches Problem', in Harm Paschen and Lothar Wigger (eds.), Schulautonomie als Entscheidungsproblem, Deutscher Studienverlag, Weinheim, pp. 43-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlrapp, Harald: 1997, 'Frames and Positions: On Grounding Argumentation Theory Pragmatically', in James Klumpp et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth SCA/AFA Conference at Alta 1997, Forthcoming.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wohlrapp, H. A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes. Argumentation 12, 341–350 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007791211241

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007791211241

Navigation