Abstract
The direct proof of transcendental idealism, in the Transcendental Aesthetic of Kant's First Critique, has borne the brunt of enormous criticism. Much of this criticism has arisen from a confusion regarding the epistemological nature of the arguments Kant proposes with the alleged ontological conclusions he draws. In this paper I attempt to deflect this species of criticism. I concentrate my analysis on the Metaphysical Expositions of Space and Time. I argue that the argument form of the Metaphysical Expositions is that of disjunctive syllogism and that Kant's primary target of attack is that of Leibnizian relativism. I provide a detailed analysis and reconstruction of the arguments of the Metaphysical Expositions, defending Kant against various claims of argumentative invalidity and incoherence. I conclude by identifying what can properly be inferred regarding the ontological nature of space and time, given my reconstructions of the arguments, and by suggesting the manner in which Kant can deflect objections from the other major proponent of transcendental realism, namely, Newtonian absolutism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
AlAzm, Sadik J.: 1972, The Origins of Kant's Arguments in the Antinomies, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Alexander, H. G.: 1956, The Leibniz Clarke Correspondence, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Allison, Henry E.: 1973, The Kant Eberhard Controversy, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Allison, Henry E.: 1983, Kant's Transcendental Idealism, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Bennett, Jonathan: 1966, Kant's Analytic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Berkeley, George: 1972, The Principles of Human Knowledge, edited by G. J. Warnockz, William Collier Sons, Glasgow.
Brittan, Gordon G. Jr.: 1978, Kant's Theory of Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Dryer, D. P.: 1966, Kant's Solution for Verification in Metaphysics, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Friedman, Michael: 1985, ‘Kant's Theory of Geometry', The Philosophilcal Review 94, 455–506.
Guyer, Paul: 1987, Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Horstmann, Rolf P.: 1976, ‘Space as Intuition and Geometry', Ratio 18, 17–30.
Humphrey, Ted B.: 1973, ‘The Historical and Conceptual Relations between Kant's Metaphysics of Space and Philosophy of Geometry', Journal of the History of Philosophy 11, 483–512.
Kant, I.: 1963, Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Norman Kemp Smith, MacMillan & Co., London.
Kant, I.: 1970, Dissertation on the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World, translated by W. Eckoff, AMS Press, New York.
Kant, I.: 1922. Gessammelte Schriften, Koniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, de Gruyter, Berlin and Leipzig.
Kant, I.: 1967, Kant, Philosophical Correspondence 1759–99, edited and translated by A. Zweig, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kant, I.: 1974, Logic, translated by R. Hartman and W. Schwarz, BobbsMerrill Co., Indianapolis.
Kant, I.: 1970, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, translated by J. Ellington, Bobbs Merrill Co., Indianapolis.
Kant, I.: 1950, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, translated by Lewis White Beck, Bobbs Merrill Co., Indianapolis.
Kemp Smith, Norman: 1923, A Commentary to Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason', Second Edition, MacMillan Press, London.
Kitcher, Patricia: 1987, ‘Discovering the Forms of Intuition', The Philosophical Review 96, 205–248.
Kitcher Patricia: 1990, Kant's Transcendental Psychology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kitcher, Philip: 1975, ‘Kant and the Foundation of Mathematics', The Philosophical Review 84, 23–50.
Kitcher, Philip: 1981, ‘How Kant Almost Wrote the “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”’, Philosophical Topics 12, 217–249.
Leibniz, G. W.: 1988, Discourse on Metaphysics, translated by G. Montgomery, Open Court Publishing, LaSalle.
Leibniz, G. W.: 1982, New Essays on Human Understanding, translated and edited by P. Remnant and J. Bennett, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Leibniz, G. W.: 1989, Philosophical Essays, translated and edited by R. Ariew and D. Garber, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
Locke, John: 1985, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by J. Yolton, Dent, London.
Melnick, Arthur: 1973, Kant's Analogies of Experience, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Melnick, Arthur: 1984, ‘The Geometry of a Form of Intuition', Topoi 3, 163–168.
Newton, I.: 1934, Principia, translated by A. Motte, revised bv A. Cajori, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Palter, Robert: 1971, ‘Absolute Space and Absolute Motion in Kant's Critical Philosophy’, Synthese 23, 47–62.
Paton, H. J.: 1936, Kant's Metaphysics of Experience, Volume One, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.
Pippin, Robert: 1982, Kant's Theory of Form, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Strawson. P. F.: 1966, The Bounds of Sense, an Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Methuen and Co., London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wojtowicz, R. The Metaphysical Expositions of Space and Time. Synthese 113, 71–115 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005008016234
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005008016234