Abstract
One of the most surprisingly prominent themes in Robert Brandom’s A Spirit of Trust is the role of genealogical explanations. Brandom sees genealogies or ‘debunking arguments’ as significant because of their ability to deprive our discursive acts (claims and actions) of the normative status they require to be genuinely discursive or conceptual. His solution to the problem of genealogy is to offer rationalizing reconstructions of others’ discursive acts, which credit them with normative status. He calls this “forgiveness” (a notion similar to Davidson’s “charity”). In this paper, I provide some additional conceptual resources to explicate Brandom’s notions of genealogy and forgiveness. These resources allow me to discriminate between two alternate and seemingly incompatible ways of responding to genealogies. One way depends on rationalizing explanations that still attempt to attribute commitments to their subjects, the other avoids making such attributions in favor of explaining commitments only in terms of norms accepted by the rationalizer. I argue that Brandom’s work sometimes promotes the latter response to genealogy but that this tendency should be eliminated from the account.
References
Brandom, R. 1994. Making it Explicit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. = ME.Search in Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2002. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2013.“ Reason, Genealogy, and the Hermeneutics of Magnanimity.” In The Howison Lectures. Berkeley: University of California. March 13, 2013 https://sites.pitt.edu/∼rbrandom/Texts/Reason_Genealogy_and_the_Hermeneutics_of.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2019. A Spirit of Trust: A Semantic Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. = ST.10.2307/j.ctvfjczmkSearch in Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, G. 1977. The Nature of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2018. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by M. Inwood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Knappik, F. 2020. “Brandom on Postmodern Ethical Life: Moral and Political Problems.” In Reading Brandom: On A Spirit of Trust, edited by Giles, B., 1984–97. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003001942-13Search in Google Scholar
Korman, D. Z. 2019. “Debunking Arguments.” Philosophy Compass 14 (12): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12638.Search in Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1997. The Last Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. 2021. “‘All for One and One for All’: Robert Brandom’s A Spirit of Trust.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103: 728–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12855.Search in Google Scholar
Plato. Gorgias. Translated by D. J. Zeyl. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2011. Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557912.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rini, R. 2016. “Debunking Debunking: A Regress Challenge for Psychological Threats to Moral Judgment.” Philosophical Studies 173 (3): 675–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0513-2.Search in Google Scholar
Rödl, S. 2018. Self-Consciousness and Objectivity: An Introduction to Absolute Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674983267Search in Google Scholar
Srinivasan, A. 2015. “The Archimedean Urge.” Philosophical Perspectives 29: 325–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12068.Search in Google Scholar
Srinivasan, A. 2019. “Genealogy, Epistemology and Worldmaking.” In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 119, 127–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoz009.Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674033962Search in Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1980. “Internal and External Reasons.” In Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165860Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
