[A]ll the artificial and figurative application of Words Eloquence hath invented are for nothing else but to insinuate wrongIdeas, move the Passions, and thereby mislead the Judgment; and so indeed are perfect cheat; And therefore, however laudable or allowable Oratory may render them in Harangues and popular Addresses, they are certainly, in all Discourses that pretend to inform or instruct, wholly to be avoided. ...
John Locke,Essay on Human Understanding, Book III.
Abstract
Ethical discourse and fallacy theory come together in a natural way over concepts such as bias, prejudice, preconceived opinion, prototypical and stereotypical thinking, dogmatism and loyalty. By and large, these are concepts that have not been sufficiently worked up to bear the theoretical weight either of ethics or of logic. The present paper seeks to ameliorate this situation. It proposes that situations describable by any such concepts partition into (a) the rationally and morally regrettable and (b) the rationally and morally impeccable, and in any event, unavoidable. Finding (b) will come as a surprise to some theorists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, F.C.: 1932,Remembering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Blais, M.J.: 1987, “Epistemic TIT FOR TAT”,Journal of Philosophy LXXXIV, 363–375.
Cartwright, N.: 1983, “How the Laws of Physics Lie”, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Cherniak, C.: 1986,Minimal Rationality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Fain, H. and A. P. Griffiths: 1972, “On Falsely Believing ‘That One Doesn't Know’ ”, in N. Rescher (ed.),Studies in the Philosophy of Mind, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 10–23.
Grice, H.P.: 1967, “Logic and Conversation”,Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hardwig, J.: 1985, “Epistemic Dependence”,Journal of Philosophy LXXXII, 335–349.
Harman, G.: 1986,Change in View, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hintikka, J.: 1989, “The Role of Logic in Argumentation”,The Monist 72, 3–24.
Holland, J.H., K.J. Holyoak, R.E. Nisbett and P.R. Thagard: 1987,Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Johnson-Laird, P.N.: 1988, “How is Meaning Mentally Represented?”, in U. Eco et al. (eds.),Meaning and Mental Representation), Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN.
Kaufman, W.: 1906. “Uber die Konstitution des Elektrons”,Ann. Phys. 19.
Lakatos, I.: 1976,Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, J. Worrell and E. Zahar (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Locke, J.: 1690,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited in two volumes and with an introduction by J.W. Yolton, Dent, London.
Minsky, M.: 1977, “Frame-system Theory”, in P.N. Johnson-Laird and P.C. Wason (eds.),Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 355–376.
Nuniiluoto, I.: 1984,Is Science Progressive?, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Oddie, G.: 1986,Likeness to Truth, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Quine, W.V.: 1975, “Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World”,Erkenntnis 9, 313–328.
Robinson, A.: 1966,Non-standard Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
van Fraassen, B.C.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Woods, J.: 1987, “Ad Baculum, Self-Interest and Pascal's Wager”, in F.H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.),Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, 343–349.
Woods, J.: 1989, “The Maladroitness of Epistemic TIT FOR TAT”,Journal of Philosophy LXXXVI, 324–331.
Woods, J. and D. Walton: 1989,Fallacies: Selected Papers, 1972–1982, Foris Publications, Dordrecht and Providence.
Woods, J.: 1992, “Public Policy and Standoffs of Force Five”, in E.M. Barth and E.C.W. Krabbe (eds.),Logic and Political Culture, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 97–108.
Woods, J.: forthcoming, “Deep Disagreement and Public Demoralization”,International Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woods, J. And so indeed are perfect cheat. Argumentation 9, 645–668 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00737784
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00737784