Skip to main content
Log in

Ideals of rationality in dialogic

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Needed for such dialogue games as dialectic are appropriate standards of fairness and rationality. The rules of procedure of dialectic must describe a game playable by actual human participants. The present paper centers on certain idealizations of the dialectician that are not allowable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, E. M. and J. L. Martens (eds.): 1982, Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, E. M.: 1985, ‘Two-phase Epistemology and Models for Dialogue Logic’, Philosophica 35, 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Lauri: 1983, Dialogue Games, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. and M. Quillian: 1969, ‘Retrieval Time From Semantic Memory’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S.: 1971, ‘The Complexity of Theorem-Proving Procedures’, Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing, 151 – 158.

  • Cook, S.: 1983, ‘An Overview of Computational Complexity’, in Communications of the Associations for Computing Machinery, 400 – 408.

  • Dascal, Marcelo (ed.): 1985, Dialogue: An Interdisciplinary Approach, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in Donald Davidson and Gilbert, Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar, Dickenson, Encino, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, C. L.: 1971, ‘Mathematical Modes of Dialogue’, Theoria 37, 130–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrah, David: 1963, Communication: A Logical Model, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrah, David: 1984, ‘The Logic of Questions’ in D. Gabbay and F. Guenher (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic II, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrah, David: 1985, ‘A Logic of Message and Reply’, Synthese 63, 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrah, David: 1986, ‘Message Semantics’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27, 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1973, Logic, Language-Games and Information, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1974, ‘Questions About Questions’, in M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1979, ‘Information-Seeking Dialogues: Some of Their Logical Properties’, Studia Logica 32, 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1981, ‘The Logic of Information-Seeking Dialogues: A Model’, in W. Becker and W. Essler (eds.), Konzepte der Dialektik, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M.: 1970, Introduction to Human Memory, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, R.: 1972, ‘Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems’, in R. Miller and J. Thatcher (eds.), Complexity of Computer Computations, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R.: 1975, Human Memory: Structures and Processes, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krabbe, E. C. W.: 1982, Studies in Dialogical Logic, (doctoral dissertation, Groningen University).

  • Krabbe, E. C. W.: 1986, ‘A Theory of Modal Dialectics’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 15, 191–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, Keith: 1974, Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, P. and D. Norman: 1977, Human Information Processing, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Kuno: 1982, ‘Die irrefuhrende Gleichstezung von Begrundungen und Argumentation: Bemerkungen zu einem monologischen Miszverstandnis in der dialogischen Logik’, in C. F. Gethman (ed.), Logik und Pragmatik: Zum Rechtfertisungsproblem logischer Sprachregeln, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, Paul and Kuno Lorenz: 1978, Dialogische Logik, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J. D.: 1979, ‘How to Stop Talking to Tortoises’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20, 705–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parret, Herman: 1980, Contexts of Understanding, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders: 1961, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. II, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard van Orman: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard van Orman: 1961, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard van Orman: 1970, Philosophy of Logic, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas: 1977, Dialectics, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred: 1969, ‘Truth and Proof’, Scientific American 220, 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1985, ‘New Directions in the Logic of Dialogue’, Synthese 63, 259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1964, Philosophische Bemerkungen, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, John: 1982, ‘Animadversions and Open Questions: Reference, Inference and Truth in Fiction’, Poetics II, 553–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, John and Douglas Walton: 1978, ‘Arresting Circles in Formal Dialogues’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 7, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, John and Douglas Walton: 1982a, ‘Question Begging and Cumulativeness in Dialectical Games’, Noûs 16, 585–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, John and Douglas Walton: 1982b, Argument: The Logic and the Fallacies, McGraw-Hill, Toronto &

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woods, J. Ideals of rationality in dialogic. Argumentation 2, 395–408 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128982

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128982

Key Words

Navigation