Abstract
Following Mayr (1961) evolutionary biologists often maintain that the hallmark of biology is its evolutionary perspective. In this view, biologists distinguish themselves from other natural scientists by their emphasis on why-questions. Why-questions are legitimate in biology but not in other natural sciences because of the selective character of the process by means of which living objects acquire their characteristics. For that reason, why-questions should be answered in terms of natural selection. Functional biology is seen as a reductionist science that applies physics and chemistry to answer how-questions but lacks a biological point of view of its own. In this paper I dispute this image of functional biology. A close look at the kinds of issues studied in biology and at the way in which these issues are studied shows that functional biology employs a distinctive biological perspective that is not rooted in selection. This functional perspective is characterized by its concern with the requirements of the life-state and the way in which these are met.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcock, J. (1998). Animal Behavior. An Evolutionary Approach. 6th edition. Sinauer, Sunderland.
Alcock, J. (2003). A textbook history of animal behavior. Animal Behavior 65: 3–10.
Alcock, J. and P. W. Sherman (1994). The utility of the proximate-ultimate dichotomy in biology. Ethology 96: 58–62.
Ariew, A. (2003). Ernst Mayr's ultimate/proximate distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology and Philosophy 18: 553–565.
Armstrong, D. P. (1991). Levels of cause and effect as organizing principles for research in animal behaviour. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 823–829.
Bigelow, J. and R. Pargetter (1987). Functions. Journal of Philosophy 84: 181–196.
Bock, W. J. and G. von Wahlert (1965). Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19: 269–299.
Canfield, J. (1964). Teleological explanation in biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14: 285–295.
Coleman, W. (1964). Georges Cuvier, Zoologist: A Study in the History of Evolution Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Craver, C. F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68: 53–74.
Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765.
Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Cuvier, G. (1817). Le Règne Animal Distribué D'apres Son Organisation. Deteuille, Paris.
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Dewsbury, D. A. (1992). On the problems studied in ethology, comparative psychology, and animal behavior. Ethology 92: 89–107.
Dewsbury, D. A. (1994). On the Utility of the Proximate-Ultimate Distinction in the Study of Animal Behavior. Ethology 96: 63–68.
Dewsbury, D. A. (1999). The proximate and the ultimate: past, present, and future. Behavioural Processes 46: 89–199.
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129.
Dullemeijer, P. (1974). Concepts and Approaches in Animal Morphology. Van Gorcum, Assen.
Francis, R. C. (1990). Causes, proximate and ultimate. Biology and Philosophy 5: 401–415.
Glennan, S. S. (1996). Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis 44: 49–71.
Glennan, S. S. (2000). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science 69: S342–353.
Goodenough, J., B. McGuire and R. A. Wallace (2001). Perspectives on Animal Behavior. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Hinde, R. A. (1975). The Concept of Function. In: Baerends, G. R., C. Beer and A. Manning (Eds). Function and Evolution in Behaviour. Clarendon, Oxford. p. 3–15.
Holekamp, K. E. and P. W. Sherman (1989). Why male ground squirrels disperse. American Scientist 77: 232–239.
Huxley, J. L. (1942). Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. Allen and Unwin, London.
Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Lagarde und Friederich, Berlin.
Kitcher, P. (1993). Function and Design. In: French, P. A., T. E. Uehling and H. K. Wettstein (Eds). Philosophy of Science. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame. p. 379–397.
Klopfer, P. H. and J. P. Hailman (1967). An Introduction to Animal Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Krebs, J. R. and N. B. Davies (Eds) (1984). Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell, Oxford.
Kuipers, T. A. F. and A. Wisniewski (1994). An erotetic approach to explanation by specification. Erkenntnis 40: 377–402.
Lenoir, T. (1982). The Strategy of Life. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Lewontin, R. (1983). Darwin's revolution. New York Review of Books 30: 21–72.
Mahner, M. and M. Bunge (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. Springer, Berlin.
Matthen, M. and A. Ariew (2002). Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. Journal of Philosophy 99: 55–83.
Mayr, E. (1959). Typological Vs. PopulationThinking.In: Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal. The Anthropological Society of Washington, Washington. p. 409–412.
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science 134: 1501–1506.
Mayr, E. (1997). This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
McFarland, D. (1999). Animal Behavior. Longman, London.
Millikan, R. G. (1989). An ambiguity in the notion “function”. Biology and Philosophy 4: 172–176.
Mitchell, S. D. (1993). Dispositions or etiologies? A comment on Bigelow and Pargetter. Journal of Philosophy 90: 249–259.
Neander, K. (1991). The teleological notion of ‘function'. Australian Journal of Philosophy 69: 454–468.
Raven, P. H. and G. B. Johnson (1999). Biology. McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Reeve, H. K. and P. W. Sherman (1993). Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Quarterly Review of Biology 68: 1–32.
Robinson, J. D. (1986). Reduction, explanation, and the quests of biological research. Philosophy of Science 53: 33–353.
Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Salmon, W. C. (1989). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Sherman, P. W. (1988). The levels of analysis. Animal Behavior 36: 616–619.
Sober, E. (1984). The Nature of Selection. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Tinbergen, N. (1951). The Study of Instinct. Clarendon, Oxford.
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20: 410–433.
Walsh, D. M. (1996). Fitness and function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 553–574.
Walsh, D. M., T. Lewens and A. Ariew (2002). The trials of life: Natural selection and random drift. Philosophy of Science 69: 452–473.
Woodfield, A. (2000). Teleological Explanation. In: Newton-Smith, W. H. (Ed.). A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell, Oxford. p. 492–494.
Wouters, A. G. (1995). Viability explanation. Biology and Philosophy 10: 435–457.
Wouters, A. G. (1999). Explanation without a Cause. Utrecht University. Ph.D. thesis. Available at <http://www.knoware.nl/users/arnow/diss/>.
Wouters, A. G. (2003). Four notions of biological function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science 34: 633–668.
Wouters, A. G. (forthcoming). Functional Explanation in Biology. In: Festa, R., A. Alisda and J. Peijnenburg (Eds). Cognitive Structures in Scientific Inquiry. Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Wright, L. (1973). Functions. Philosophical Review 82: 139–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wouters, A. (2005). The Functional Perspective of Organismal Biology. In: Reydon, T.A., Hemerik, L. (eds) Current Themes in Theoretical Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2904-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2904-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2901-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2904-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)