Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Business and Society Scholarship Matter to Society? Pursuing a Normative Agenda with Critical Realism and Neoinstitutional Theory

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, B&S researchers have pursued their normative aims through strategic and moral arguments that are limited because they adopt a rational actor behavioral model and firm-level focus. I argue that it would be beneficial for B&S scholars to pursue alternate approaches based on critical realism (CR) and neoinstitutional theory (IT). Such a shift would have a number of benefits. For one, CR and IT recognize the complex roots of firm behavior and provide tools for its investigation. Both approaches also note the importance of social context and IT, in particular, points to tangible sites where changes in (and outcomes of) corporate practices can be assessed. CR also has an emancipatory ethos which harkens a role for scholars in social change, while IT provides mechanisms to ground this ethos in tangible activities that go beyond appealing to managers’ strategic or moral sensibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (1995). Strategic Management as Domination and Emancipation: From Planning and Process to Communication and Praxis. Advances in Strategic Management, 12, 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. 1995. “Realist social theory: The morphogenic approach”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2000). For structure: It’s reality, properties, and powers: A reply to Anthony King. The Sociological Review, 48, 464–472. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2002). Realism and the problem of agency. Journal of Critical Realism, 5, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avi-Yonah, R. (2004). Corporations, society, and the state: A defense of the corporate tax. Virginia Law Review, 90, 1193–1239. doi:10.2307/3202379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., W. Ding and T. Stuart: 2009, ‹The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality, and Direction of (Public) Research Output’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, forthcoming.

  • Barboza, D. and A. Barrionuevo: 2007, ‹Filler in Animal Feed is an Open Secret in China’, New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/business/worldbusiness/30food.html?_r=1&oref=slogin. Accessed from September 2008

  • Barker, J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408–437. doi:10.2307/2393374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S., & Tolbert, P. (1997). Institutional links and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93–771. doi:10.1177/017084069701800106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 11–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. 1978. “A realist theory of science”. Harvester-Wheatsheaf, Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. 1993. “Dialectic: The pulse of freedom”. Verso, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. (2008). The subprime mortgage crisis. New Left Review, 50, 63–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D., Rosile, G., Durant, R., & Luhman, J. (2004). Enron spectacles: A critical dramaturgical analysis. Organization Studies, 25, 751–774. doi:10.1177/0170840604042413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D., & Windsor, R. (1993). The resurrection of Taylorism: Total quality management’s hidden agenda. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6, 57–71. doi:10.1108/09534819310042740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1984. ”Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste”. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. 1953. “Social responsibilities of the businessman”. Harper & Row, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. 1988. “The moral obligations of multinational corporations”. In S. Luper-Foy (Ed.), Problems of international justice. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum, E., & Battilana, J. (2005). Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 4, 355–383. doi:10.1177/1476127005058996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. 1992. “Structural holes”. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás, M., & Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 649–671. doi:10.2307/259347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. 1962. “Silent spring”. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., & Deephouse, D. (1999). ‹Tough talk’ or ‹soothing speech:’ Managing reputations for being tough and for being good. Corporate Reputation Review, 2, 308–332. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117. doi:10.2307/258888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E., & Cook, J. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441–466. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, E., & Gaughan, M. (2005). Scientists’ participation in unversity research centers: What are the gender differences? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 371–381. doi:10.1007/s10961-005-2582-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). 1997. “Political economy of modern capitalism”. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneke, G. (1985). Regulation and the sociopathic firm. Academy of Management Review, 10, 15–20. doi:10.2307/258207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibility? California Management Review, 2, 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 312–322. doi:10.2307/255331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.: 1991, ‹Agents Without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill Through the Intercorporate Network’, Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 583–613.

  • Davis, G., & Anderson, P. 2008. “Social movements and failed institutionalization: Corporate (non) response to the AIDS epidemic”. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage Publications, London, UK, pp. 352–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. and C. Marquis: 2005, ‹Prospects for Organizational Theory in the Early 21st Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms’, Organization Science 16, 332–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Hond, F., & de Bakker. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 148, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. 1991. “The new institutionalism in organizational analysis”. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative socia lcontracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19, 252–284. doi:10.2307/258705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. 1999. ”Ties that bind”. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91. doi:10.2307/258887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. 1998. “Social contract theory”. In G. Cooper & C. Argyris (Eds.), The concise Blackwell encyclopedia of management. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 603–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, R., & Walton, C. 1974. “Conceptual foundations of business”. Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74. doi:10.2307/258191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, M. (1992). Causal explanation of social action: The contribution of Max Weber and critical realism to a generative view of causal explanation in social science. Acta Sociologica, 35, 107–122. doi:10.1177/000169939203500203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W., & Stevens, M. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. 2000. “Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. 1996. “Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image”. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258. doi:10.2307/256324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1982, ‹Space, Knowledge, and Power: An Interview with Michel Foucault by Paul Rainbow’, Skyline, March, 19–27

  • Freeman, R. 1984. “Strategic management: A stakeholder approach”. (Pitman, Boston MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. 1991. “Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions”. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL), pp. 232–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, 32–33, 122, 124, 126, September 13

  • Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta- analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36, 221–249. doi:10.1177/000765039703600302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191–205. doi:10.2307/259074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A.: 2003, ‹Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards’, Governance 16, 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate Charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–1981, 1987–1989. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 445–471. doi:10.2307/2393734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardberg, N., & Fombrun, C. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31, 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, R. (1997). Hazardous measures: An interpretive textual analysis of quantitative sensemaking during crises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 583–622. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:1±≤583::AID-JOB908≥3.0.CO;2-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, I. 1959. “The presentation of self in everyday life”. (Doubleday, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80. doi:10.2307/3069285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 58–86. doi:10.2307/2393591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 685–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, D. 2003. “Survey on corporate-community relations”. (Social Sciences Research Council, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. (1994). Presidential address: What if the Academy really mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19, 11–16. doi:10.2307/258833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave, T., & Van de Ven, A. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 864–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F.: 1958, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Wiley, New York, NY).

  • Hiatt, S., W. Sine and P. Tolbert: 2008, From Pabst to Pepsi: The Deinstitutionalization of Social Practices and the Emergence of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Presented at the 6th West Coast Research Symposium on Technology Entrepreneurship, Stanford, CA

  • Hinings, R., & Greenwood, R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 411–421. doi:10.2307/3094844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. 1997. “From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism”. (New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371. doi:10.2307/257008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holder-Webb, L., J. Cohen, L. Nath and D. Wood: 2008, ‹The Supply of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures Among US Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 83, 543–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Intel: 2005, ‹Community and Commitment: Global Citizenship Report 2004’, http://www.intelcom/intel/finance/gcr04/index.htm. Accessed from May, 2005

  • Jensen, H. (2003). Staging political consumption: A discourse analysis of the Brent Spar conflict recast by the Danish mass media. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10, 71–80. doi:10.1016/S0969-6989(01)00041-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. 1971. “Business in contemporary society: Framework and issues”. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., & Greening, D. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576. doi:10.2307/256977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1996). Missing the forest for the trees: A critique of the social responsibility concept and discourse. Business & Society, 35, 7–41. doi:10.1177/000765039603500102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, D., & Lipton, P. (2005). Corporate governance and business ethics in the Asia-Pacific region. Business & Society, 44, 178–210. doi:10.1177/0007650305275300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KLD: 2008, ‹KLD Research’, http://www.kld.com/research/index.html. Accessed from September 2008

  • Krimsky, S. 2002. “Science in the private interest: Has the lure of Profits corrupted biomedical research?”. (Rowman & Littlefield, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumra, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). A study of the promotion to partner process in a professional services firm: How women are disadvantaged. British Journal of Management, 19, 65–74. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00572.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, W. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253–261. doi:10.1023/A:1022962719299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. 2006. “Institutions and institutional work”. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leca, B., & Naccache, P. (2006). A critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship. Organization, 13, 627–651. doi:10.1177/1350508406067007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social repsonsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., J. Mov, K. Lam and W. Chu: 2007, ‹Institutional Pillars and Corruption at the Societal Level’, Journal of Business Ethics 83, 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 29–56. doi:10.2307/2667124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 255–266. doi:10.2307/3069295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012. doi:10.1177/0170840607078111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. (2003). Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: Cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 71–104. doi:10.1093/soceco/1.1.71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, L., S. Ruiz, and A. Rubio: 2008, ‹The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming.

  • Marquis, C., Glynn, M., & Davis, G. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32, 925–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and A. Crane: 2005, ‹Corporate Citizenship: Toward and Extended Conceptualization’, Academy of Management Review 30, 166–179.

  • Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 109–120. doi:10.1023/A:1024128730308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E.: 2008, ‹SUV Owners Keep on Truck in Despite Gas Prices’, CNN, http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayoflife/06/06/SUV.owners/index.html?iref=newssearch. Accessed from August, 2008

  • McLean, B., & Elkind, P. 2004. “The smartest guys in the room: The amazing rise and scandalous fall of Enron”. (Portfolio, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A., & Pattison, P. (2000). Composing a civic arena: Publics, projects, and social settings. Poetics, 27, 163–194. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00024-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–887. doi:10.2307/259247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R., & Graham, L. (2007). Buying science and selling science: Gender differences in the market for commercial science. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 657–689. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagar, R. (2002). Footloose researchers, ‹traveling’ theories, and the politics of transnational feminist praxis. Gender, Place and Culture, 9, 179–186. doi:10.1080/09663960220139699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, J., & Neiminen, T. (2001). The objectivity of corporate environmental reporting: A study of Finnish listed firms’ environmental disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10, 29–37. doi:10.1002/1099-0836(200101/02)10:1≤29::AID-BSE268≥3.0.CO;2-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio, W. (1997). Toward an attention based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1±≤187::AID-SMJ936≥3.3.CO;2-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, S., & Watson, R. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the UK privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 526–538. doi:10.2307/256974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179. doi:10.2307/258610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–427. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 51–66. doi:10.2307/3857232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. (2007). Opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: Connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in Strategic Organization. Strategic Organization, 5, 313–320. doi:10.1177/1476127007079956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. 1994. “Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment”. (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1980. “Competitive strategy”. (The Free Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, G. (2002). Collaborating across our differences. Gender, Place and Culture, 9, 195–200. doi:10.1080/09663960220139716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S., Hinings, B., & Greenwood, R. (1980). The structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 1–17. doi:10.2307/2392223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., & Kenney, M. 2008. “New Forms as settlements”. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. (Sage Publications, London, UK), pp. 352–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Cuisine as an identity movement in French cuisine. American Journal of Sociology, 4, 795–843. doi:10.1086/367917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reger, R., & Huff, A. (1983). Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 103–124. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323–348. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39, 397–418. doi:10.1177/000765030003900404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. (2007). Carrying Sumantra Ghoshal’s torch: Creating more positive, relevant, and ecologically Valid Research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 745–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. 1994. “Representations of the intellectual”. (Vintage Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiia, D., Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy. Business & Society, 42, 169–202. doi:10.1177/0007650303042002002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. 1992. “Method in social science: A realist approach”. (Routledge, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. 2000. “Realism and social science”. (Sage Publications, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. 2008. “Institutions and Organizations”. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W., Ruef, M., Mendel, C., & Caronna, C. 2000. “Institutional change and healthcare organizations”. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, M., & Lounsbury, M. 2008. “Social movements and institutional analysis”. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. (Sage Publications, London, UK), pp. 650–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1986). Is strategic management ideological? Journal of Management, 12, 363–377. doi:10.1177/014920638601200305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sine, W. and B. Lee: 2009, ‹Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector’, Administrative Science Quarterly, forthcoming.

  • Steiner, G. 1971: “Business & society”. (Random House, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, M.: 2008, ‹Boycott Basics: Moral Guidelines for Corporate Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming.

  • Stryker, S. 1980. “Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version”. (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43–64. doi:10.2307/258886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506–521. doi:10.2307/259139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, W. (2006). Climate emergency. IEEE Spectrum, 43, 49–50. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2006.1665056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. 2004. “Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing”. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801–843. doi:10.1086/210361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. 2008. “Institutional logics”. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. (Sage Publications, London, UK), pp.99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1994). What is management? An outline of a metatheory. British Journal of Management, 5, 289–301. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00080.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D., & Greening, D. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672. doi:10.2307/257057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (2007). Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 769–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P. 1996. “Towards an ethically-based conception of socio-economic rationality”. In W. Gasparski & L. Ryan (Eds.), Human action in business. (Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ), pp. 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B.: 1997, ‹Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 35–67. doi: 10.2307/2393808

  • Vaughan, D. (2006). “NASA revisited: Theory, analogy, and public sociology”. American Journal of Sociology 112, 353–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & Graves, S. 1997. The corporate social performance – financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wal-Mart: 2008, ‹The Wal-Mart Story’, http://www.walmartfacts.com/content/default.aspx?id=1. Accessed from October, 2008

  • Welcomer, S., Gioia, D., & Kilduff, M. (2000). Resisting the discourse of modernity: Rationality versus emotion in hazardous waste settings. Human Relations, 53, 1175–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J. and E. Zajac: 1998, ‹Symbolic Management of Stockholders: Corporate Governance Reforms and Shareholder Reactions’, Administrative Science Quarterly 43, 127–153. doi: 10.2307/2393593

  • Williamson, O. 1985. “The economic institutions of capitalism”. (Free Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 2005, ‹Theorizing Contemporary Control: Some Postructuralist Responses to Some Critical Realist Questions’, Organization 12, 747–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D. (2001). The future of corporate social responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 225–256. doi:10.1108/eb028934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718. doi:10.2307/258977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1998). Keeping up with the real world. Business & Society, 37, 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (2000). Theory and integrity in business and society. Business & Society, 39, 359–378. doi:10.1177/000765030003900402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., & Jones, R. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research of corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267. doi:10.1108/eb028831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wry, T.: 2006, Steak vs. Sizzle: Investigating the Influence of Corporate Communications and the Media on Perceptions of CSP. Presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2E7

    Tyler Earle Wry

Authors
  1. Tyler Earle Wry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyler Earle Wry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wry, T.E. Does Business and Society Scholarship Matter to Society? Pursuing a Normative Agenda with Critical Realism and Neoinstitutional Theory. J Bus Ethics 89, 151–171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9991-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9991-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation