Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) May 11, 2020

Das Verhältnis zwischen erster und zweiter Natur bei John McDowell und Nicolai Hartmann

  • Matthias Wunsch EMAIL logo

Abstract

When discussing the philosophical question of the relation between mind and nature, dualistic approaches are often contrasted with scientistic approaches. However, mind can be situated in nature in a non-scientistic manner and outside of nature in a non-dualistic manner. John McDowell represents the first approach, as he connects mind to our second nature. In his attempt to specify the categorial relation between first and second nature, McDowell finds himself in a dilemma which cannot be solved within his framework. The second approach is represented by Nicolai Hartmann, for whom mind does not belong to nature, but to the real world. Hartmann’s ontology of layers is able to avoid McDowell’s dilemma and the unity of the real world is made intelligible.

Literatur

Dahlstrom, D. (2012), Zur Aktualität der Ontologie Nicolai Hartmanns, in: Hartung, G., Wunsch, M., u. Strube, C. (Hg.), Von der Systemphilosophie zur systematischen Philosophie – Nicolai Hartmann, Berlin u. Boston, 349–366.10.1515/9783110269901.349Search in Google Scholar

Funke, G., u. Rath, N. (1984), Art. „Natur, zweite“, in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie 6, Basel, Spp. 484‒494.Search in Google Scholar

Gaskin, R. (2006), Experience and the World’s own Language. A Critique of John McDowell’s Empiricism, Oxford.10.1093/0199287252.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gubeljic, M., Link, S., Müller, P., u. Osburg, G. (2000), Nature and Second Nature in McDowell’s „Mind and World“, in: Willaschek, M. (Hg.), John McDowell: Reason and Nature. Lecture and Colloquium in Münster 1999, Münster, 41–49.Search in Google Scholar

Halbig, C. (2006), Varieties of Nature in Hegel and McDowell, in: European Journal of Philosophy 14.2, 222–241.10.1002/9781444306736.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, N. (1942), Neue Wege der Ontologie, in: ders. (Hg.), Systematische Philosophie, Stuttgart u. Berlin, 199–311.Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, N. (1949), Das Problem des geistigen Seins [1933]. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der Geschichtsphilosophie und der Geisteswissenschaften, 2. Aufl., Berlin.10.1515/9783111456416Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, N. (1964), Der Aufbau der realen Welt: Grundriss der allgemeinen Kategorienlehre [1940], 3. Aufl., Berlin.10.1515/9783110823844Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, I. (2001), Hartmann’s nonreductive Materialism, Superimposition, and Supervenience, in: Axiomathes 12, 195–215.10.1023/A:1015824714956Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (1996), Mind and World, Cambridge, Mass.10.2307/j.ctvjghtzjSearch in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (2000), Responses, in: Willaschek, M. (Hg.), John McDowell: Reason and Nature. Lecture and Colloquium in Münster 1999, Münster, 91–114.Search in Google Scholar

Rath, N. (2019), Unmittelbarkeitssehnsucht. Entwürfe einer zweiten Natur, Würzburg 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Scheler, M. (1928), Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos, in: ders., Gesammelte Werke 9. Späte Schriften, Bonn 1995, 7‒71.Search in Google Scholar

Wunsch, M. (2008), Mensch und Natur in McDowells ‚Mind and World‘, in: Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft. Sektionsbeiträge, Essen: Univ. Duisburg-Essen, URL: www.dgphil2008.de/fileadmin/download/Sektionsbeitraege/03-2_Wunsch.pdf (11.2.2020).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-05-11
Published in Print: 2020-05-05

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2020-0015/html
Scroll to top button