Homeric ἴσκε(ν) (Od. 19.203; 22.31) and its Reception in Apollonius and Theocritus

Article Authentication required
Subscibe in publisher´s online store Share via email
Homeric ἴσκε(ν) (Od. 19.203; 22.31) and its Reception in Apollonius and Theocritus
Xian, Ruobing

From the journal Hermes Hermes, Volume 152, February 2024, issue 1

Published by Franz Steiner Verlag

article, 5760 Words
Original language: English
Hermes 2024, pp 57-67
https://doi.org/10.25162/hermes-2024-0004

Abstract Related content References

Abstract

This article focuses on the interpretation of Homeric ἴσκε(ν) (Od. 19.203; 22.31) as well as its reception in Apollonius Rhodius (A. R. 1.834 et alibi) and Theocritus (Id. 22.167). I argue that the passage Od. 22.31-33, in which ἴσκεν (Od. 22.31) occurs, was owed to a bard’s imitation of Od. 19.203, who not only took ἴσκε (Od. 19.203) as a verbum dicendi but used ἴσκεν ἕκαστος ἀνήρ at Od. 22.31 as a semantic equivalent of the Homeric formula ὣς ἄρα τις εἴπεσκε(ν). It will further show that Apollonius’ frequent employment of ἴσκω meaning ‘say’ is mainly modelled on Od. 22.31 and ἴσκον at Theocritus Id. 22.167 is understood by the poet as an ‘iterative’. If this interpretation is accepted, it might shed some new light on the relative chronology of Apollonius’ Argonautica and Theocritus’ two Idylls (13; 22).

Author information

Ruobing Xian

Keywords

Homer | Odyssey | Hesiod | ἴσκε(ν) | Apollonius | Theocritus (Id. 13, 22)

Related content

References

  • 1. Bechtel, F. 1914. Lexilogus zu Homer. Halle.
  • 2. Campbell, M. 1990. ‘Theocritus Thirteen’, in: E. M. Craik (ed.) ‘Owls to Athens’: Essays on Classical Subjects for Sir Kenneth Dover, Oxford 1990, 113-119.
  • 3. Campbell, M. 1994. A Commentary on Apollonius Rhodius Argonautica III 1-471. Leiden.
  • 4. Chantraine, P. 1942/2013. Grammaire homérique: Tome 1. Phonétique et morphologie. Paris.
  • 5. DeForest, M. M. 1994. Apollonius’ Argonautica. A Callimachean Epic. Leiden.
  • 6. de Jong, I. 1987. ‘The voice of anonymity. τις-speeches in the Iliad’, Eranos, 85, 69-84.
  • 7. de Jong, I. 2001. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge.
  • 8. Dunkel, G. 2021. ‘ἴσκε in the Odyssey’, Glotta 97, 83-88.
  • 9. Dyck, A. 1987. ‘The glossographoi’. HSCP 91, 119-160.
  • 10. Ebeling, H. 1885. Lexicon Homericum. Leipzig.
  • 11. Forssman, B. 2019. Die homerischen Verbalformen. Dettelbach.
  • 12. Fränkel, H. 1915. De Simia Rhodio. Göttingen.
  • 13. Edwards, M. 1971. The Language of Hesiod. Oxford.
  • 14. Glei, R. F. 2001. ‘Outlines of Apollonian scholarship 1955-1999’, in: T. Papanghelis and A. Rengakos (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, Leiden, 1-26.
  • 15. Gow, A. S. F. 1952. Theocritus. Volume I: Introduction, Text and Translation. Cambridge.
  • 16. Griffiths, F. T. 1976. ‘Theocritus’ silent Dioscuri’, GRBS 17, 353-367.
  • 17. Halliwell, S. 2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.
  • 18. Hornblower, S. 2015. Lykophron: Alexandra. Oxford.
  • 19. Hunter, R. 1996. Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. Cambridge.
  • 20. Hunter, R. 1999. Theocritus. A Selection Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 13. Cambridge.
  • 21. Jacquinod, B. 1990. ‘Le Rôle du système dans l’évolution d’un verbe en grec ancien’, in: H. Andersen and K. Koerner (eds.) Historical Linguistics 1987, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 245-251.
  • 22. Kannicht, R. 1980. ‘Der alte Streit zwischen Philosophie und Dichtung. Zwei Vorlesungen über Grundzüge der griechischen Literaturauffassung’, Der Altsprachliche Unterricht 23, 6-36.
  • 23. Kimball, S. 2014. ‘Homeric κρύπτασκε, ῥίπτασκε and ἰσάσκετo’, Glotta 90, 163-173.
  • 24. Knaack, G. 1888. ‘Zu den Aitien des Kallimachos’, Hermes 23, 131-141.
  • 25. Köhnken, A. 1965. Apollonios Rhodios und Theokrit. Die Hylas- und die Amyklosgeschichten beider Dichter und die Frage der Priorität. Göttingen.
  • 26. Köhnken, A. 1996. ‘Paradoxien in Theokrits Hylasgedicht’, Hermes 124, 442-462.
  • 27. Köhnken, A. 2001. ‘Hellenistic chronology: Theocritus, Callimachus, and Apollonius Rhodius’, in: T. D. Papanghelis and A. Rengakos (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, Leiden, 73-94.
  • 28. Martin, R. 1984. ‘Hesiod, Odysseus, and the instruction of princes’, TAPA 114, 29-48.
  • 29. Pompella, G. 2002. Apollonii Rhodii Lexicon. Hildesheim.
  • 30. Rengakos, A. 1994. Apollonios Rhodios und die antike Homererklärung. München.
  • 31. Risch, E. 1974. Wortbildung der homerischen Sprache. Berlin.
  • 32. Sellschopp, I. 1934. Stilistische Untersuchungen zu Hesiod. Diss. Hamburg.
  • 33. Sens, A. 1997. Dioscuri (Idyll 22). Göttingen.
  • 34. Sider, D. 2020. Simonides: Epigrams and Elegies. Oxford.
  • 35. Stoddard, K. 2004. The Narrative Voice in the Theogony of Hesiod. Leiden.
  • 36. Van der Valk, M. 1949. Textual Criticism of the Odyssey. Leiden.
  • 37. Vian, F. 1976. Apollonios de Rhodes Argonautiques chants I-II. Paris.
  • 38. West, M. 1966. Hesiod, Theogony. Oxford.
  • 39. West, M. 2014. The Making of the Odyssey. Oxford.
  • 40. v. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. 1906. Die Textgeschichte der griechischen Bukoliker. Berlin.
  • 41. Willi, A. 2018. Origins of the Greek Verb. Cambridge.
  • 42. Zerdin, J. 2002. ‘The “Iterative-Intensives” in-σκον’, Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 7, 103-130.