Skip to main content
Log in

Abduction and metaphor: An inquiry into common cognitive mechanism

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Abstract

Abduction and metaphor are two significant concepts in cognitive science. It is found that the both mental processes are on the basis of certain similarity. The similarity inspires us to seek the answers to the following two questions: (1) Whether there is a common cognitive mechanism behind abduction and metaphor? And (2) if there is, whether this common mechanism could be interpreted within the unified frame of modern intelligence theory? Centering on these two issues, the paper attempts to characterize and interpret the generation and evolution of scientific metaphors from the perspective of the cognitive mechanism of abductive inference. Then it interprets the common cognitive mechanism behind abduction and metaphor within Hawkins’ frame of intelligence theory. The commonality between abduction and metaphor indicates the potential to further explore human intelligence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, M. (1993). “More about Metaphor,” in Metaphor and Thought, ed. by A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W. (2008). “Metaphor and Thought: The State of the Art,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by R. W. Gibbs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins J., and Blakeslee S. (2004). On Intelligence. New York: Times Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, J. R., and Josephson, S. G. (1996). Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, Reason, and Science. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive Cogniton: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Berlin: Springer Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Osho (2007). Tao: The Three Treasures (Chinese Edition), Vol. 1. Xi’an: Shaanxi Shifan Daxue Chubanshe

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. I–VI, eds. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss; Vols. VII–VIII, ed. by Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, B. (2008). “Comments Regarding Charles Sanders Peirce’s Notion of Consciousness, Abduction, and the Hypo-Icon Metaphor.” Semiotica, 172: 11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhart, E. C. (2001). The Logic of Metaphor: Analogous Parts of possible Worlds. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (2007). “Abductive Inference: From Philosophical Analysis to Neural Mechanisms,” in Inductive Reasoning: Experimental, Developmental, and Computational Approaches, eds. by Feendy, A. & Heit E. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hengwei Li.

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, C., Li, H. Abduction and metaphor: An inquiry into common cognitive mechanism. Front. Philos. China 6, 480–491 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0151-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0151-5

Keywords

Navigation