Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Reconciliation of Filial Piety and Political Authority in Early China

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay traces changes in the relationship between filial piety and loyalty in early China. During the Spring and Autumn and early-mid Warring States periods, a conflict existed between the two values. Confucian thinkers such as Confucius and Mencius put a priority on filial piety, while Shang Yang 商鞅 regarded it detrimental to the state. However, scholars later tended to reconcile the values, as is evident in the Xiaojing 孝經 (The Classic of Filial Piety) and the “Zhongxiao 忠孝” (“Loyalty and Filial Piety”) chapter of the Hanfeizi 韓非子. The two texts reconcile filial piety with political authority, and show that the two values are based on the same foundation. Ancient Chinese legal documents are in agreement with the same trend. Early Chinese governments made unfiliality illegal and permitted the head of a family to have very strong authority over other members of the household. Still, governments maintained control of individual households by putting the head of the family’s authority under political authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cao, Feng 曹峰. 2009. “An Emphasis on Filial Piety in the Qin Bamboo Slips from Shuihudi 睡虎地秦簡所見對孝的重視.” Research in the Traditions of Chinese Culture 國學學刊 3: 101–107.

  • Cao, Lüning 曹旅寧. 2002. A New Research on the Qin Statutes 秦律新探. Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe 中國社會科學出版社.

  • Chen, Qiyou 陳奇猷. 2000. Hanfeizi with New Collations and Commentary 韓非子新校注. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  • Duyvendak, J. J. L. 1963. The Book of Lord Shang: A Classic of the Chinese School of Law. London: A. Probsthain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Min 高敏. 1982. A Preliminary Research on the Yunmeng Qin Bamboo Slips 雲夢秦簡初探. Beijing 北京: He’nan Remin Chubanshe 湖南人民出版社.

  • Goldin, Paul R. 2012. “Han Law and the Regulation of Interpersonal Relations: The Confucianization of the Law Revisited.” Asia Major 25.1: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Jiegang 顧頡剛. 1982. “A Study of the Mozian Origin of the Abdication Tradition 禪讓傳說起於墨家考.” In Gu Jiegang 顧頡剛, Luo Genze 羅根澤, Lü Simian 呂思勉, eds., Debates on Ancient Histories 古史辨, vol. 7. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  • Hulsewé, A. F. P. 1985. Remnants of Ch’in Law: An Annotated Translation of the Ch’in Legal and Administrative Rules of the 3rd Century B.C., Discovered in Yün-meng Prefecture, Hu-pei Province. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

  • Jia, Liying 賈麗英. 2008. “A Study of Unfilial Crime in the Qin and the Han Dynasties 秦漢不孝罪考論.” Journal of Shijiazhuang College 石家莊學院學報 10.1: 68–79.

  • Kang, Xuewei 康學偉. 1992. Research of the Pre-Qin Way of Filial Piety 先秦孝道硏究. Taipei 台北: Wenjin Chubanshe 文津出版社.

  • Knapp, Keith N. 1995. “The Ru Reinterpretation of Xiao.” Early China 20: 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblock, John, and Jeffrey Riegel, trans. 2000. The Annals of Lü Buwei. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Lau, D. C., trans. 1992. The Analects. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • ____, trans. 2003. The Mencius. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • Lau, Ulrich. 2005. “The Scope of Private Jurisdiction.” Asiatische Studien 59.1: 333–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ōta, Tadashi 太田方. 1911. Han Feizi with Wings and Fluffs 韓非子翼毳. In Chinese Literature Series 漢文大系, vol. 20. Tōkyō 東京: Fuzanbō 冨山房.

  • Pines, Yuri. 2005. “Disputers of Abdication: Zhanguo Egalitarianism and the Sovereign’s Power.” T’oung Pao 91.4–5: 243–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radice, Thomas. The Ways of Filial Piety in Early China. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rong, Zhaozu 容肇祖. 1972. Han Feizi with an Investigation 韓非子考證. Taipei 台北: Tailian Guofeng Chubanshe 台聯國風出版社.

  • Rosemont Jr., Henry, and Roger T. Ames. 2009. The Chinese Classic of Family Reverence: A Philosophical Translation of the Xiaojing. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuihudi Qinmu Zhujian Zhengli Xiaozu 睡虎地秦墓竹簡整理小組. 1978. Bamboo Slips from the Qin Tomb of Shuihudi 睡虎地秦墓竹簡. Beijing 北京: Wenwu Chubanshe 文物出版社.

  • Wei, Hong 衛宏. 1965. Account of the Institutions of Former Han and Other Three Kinds 漢舊儀及其他三種. Taipei 台北: Taiwan Shangwu Yinshuguan 台灣商務印書館.

  • Wakae, Kenzo 若江賢三. 1997. “The Crime of Unfiliality in the Qin and Han Statutes 秦漢律における不孝罪.” Journal of Oriental Researches 東洋史研究 55.2: 249–282.

  • Wu, Guang 吳光. 1985. A Comprehensive Discussion of the Huang-Lao School 黃老之學通論. Hangzhou 杭州: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe 浙江人民出版社.

  • Zhangjiashan Er-si-qi Hao Hanmu Zhujian Zhengli Xiaozu 張家山二四七號漢墓竹簡整理小組. 2006. Bamboo Slips from the Han Tomb of Zhangjiashan (with Revised Interpretations) 張家山漢墓竹簡 (釋文修訂本). Beijing 北京: Wenwu Chubanshe 文物出版社.

  • Zhou, Xunchu 周勳初. 1980. Han Feizi with Reading Notes 韓非子札記. Nanjing 南京: Jiangsu Renmin Chubanshe 江蘇人民出版社.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Chonnam National University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, 61186, South Korea

    Soon-ja Yang

Authors
  1. Soon-ja Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soon-ja Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Sj. The Reconciliation of Filial Piety and Political Authority in Early China. Dao 16, 187–203 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9546-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9546-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation