Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Being grateful for being: Being, reverence and finitude

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atheists are rarely associated with holiness, yet they can have deeply spiritual experiences. Once such experience of the author exemplified ‘the holy’ as defined by Otto. However, the subjectivism of Otto’s Kantianism undermines Otto’s otherwise fruitful approach. While the work of Hegel overcomes this, it is too rationalistic to account for mortal life. Seeking to avoid these shortcomings, this paper places ‘holiness’ within a self-differentiating ontological unity, the Heideggerian ‘fourfold’. This unity can only be experienced by confronting groundless finite mortality, and the resulting existential disposition is characterized as ‘reverence’. Reverence is gratitude for mortal existence, and existence itself. Moreover, it is as much political as it is ontological, atheistic as it is theistic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Endnotes

  1. Kazantzakis, Nikos,The Odyssey: A Modem Sequel (London: Simon and Schuster, 1958), p.500.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ritsos, Yannis, ‘Accented Colours’, inYannis Ritsos: Selected Poems 1938–1988, eds. Kimon Friar and Kostas Myrsiades (Brockport: BOA Editions, 1989), p.144.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Genesis, 1:2.

  4. I am grateful to Paul Ashton, Terry Eyssens, Pete Moore and Ruth Quibell for their thoughts on this experience.

  5. Otto, Rudolph,The Idea of the Holy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., pp.68–71.

  7. Ibid., pp.29–30.

  8. Kazantzakis,The Odyssey: A Modern Sequel.

  9. Dostoyevsky, Fyodor,Brothers Karamazov, Volumes I and 2 (Ringwood: Penguin Books, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Otto, op. cit., pp.175–178 andpassim.

  11. Ibid.,p.29.

  12. Ibid., p.114.

  13. Ibid., pp.112–116.

  14. Reck, A.J.,Speculative Philosophy (Alburquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1972), p.159.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kant, Immanuel,Critique of Pure Reason, trans. J.M.D. Meiklejohn (London: J.M. Dent and Sons, 1959), p.52 andpassim.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., p.108.

  17. Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich,Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, Part 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), p.66.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Otto, op. cit., pp.145–150.

  19. Kant, op. cit., pp.41–47.

  20. Otto, op. cit., p.29.

  21. Young, Damon A., ‘Quantum Karma: Semantic Superficiality in New Age Religions’,Democracy and Nature 4 2/3 (1999): 95–112.; Young, Damon A., ‘Stealing the Voice of Orpheus’,Concrescence 31 (2002): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich,Lectures in the Philosophy of Religion: The 1827 Lectures (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p.178.

  24. Ibid.,p.90.

  25. Ibid., pp. 134–135.

  26. Otto, op. cit., pp.13–30.

  27. Hegel,Lectures in the Philosophy of Religion, pp. 157–159.

  28. Hegel,Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, pp.25–46.

  29. Hegel,Lectures in the Philosophy of Religion, p.90.

  30. Ibid., p.173.

  31. Hegel,Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, pp.60–94 andpassim.

  32. Dreyfus, Hubert,Being-in-the-World (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1995), p.162.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ricoeur, Paul, Time and Narrative, Volume 3 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), p.206.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Heidegger, Martin,Being and Time (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid., pp.50–55.

  36. Heidegger, Martin,The Phenomenology of Religious Life, trans. Matthias Fritsch and Jennifer Anna Gosetti (Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2004), p.252.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Heidegger,Being and Time, p.60.

  38. Dreyfus,Being-in-the-World, p.25.

  39. Heidegger, Martin,An Introduction to Metaphysics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), pp.14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Young, Damon A., ‘Not Easy Being Green’,Ethics, Place and Environment 5 3 (2002): 190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hegel,Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, p. 124.

  42. Ibid., p.125.

  43. Ibid.

  44. Ibid.

  45. Ibid., p.40.

  46. Ibid., pp.244ff.

  47. Hegel,Lectures in the Philosophy of Religion, p. 173.

  48. Stewart, John, ‘Hegel and the Myth of Reason’, inThe Hegel Myths and Legends, ed. John Stewart (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1996), pp.306–318.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Heidegger, Martin,Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988), p.149.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid.

  51. Heidegger, Martin, ‘The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking’, inMartin Heidegger: Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell (London: Routledge, 1996), p.446.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Snow, David E.,Schelling and the End of Idealism (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 454; Gare, Arran,Nihilism Inc. (Como: Eco-Logical Press, 1996), pp.218–219.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Clayton, John P., ‘Questioning, Answering, and Tillich’s Concept of Correlation’, inKairos and Logos, ed. John J. Carey ([ine loco]: Mercer University Press, 1984), pp.138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Heidegger, Martin, cited inMartin Heidegger and National Socialism, eds. N. Günther and E. Kettering (New York: Paragon House, 1990), p.57.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Heidegger,The Phenomenology of Religious Life.

  56. Heidegger, Martin,Poetry, Language, Thought (London: Harper and Row, 1975), pp.165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid, pp. 149–151.

  58. Mehta, J.L.,The Philosophy of Martin Heidegger (London: Harper and Row, 1971), p.218.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Young, Damon A., ‘The Mortal Blessings of Narrative’,Philosophy Today 45 3/4 (2001): 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Heidegger,Poetry, Language, Thought, pp.172–174.

  61. Ibid., pp.103–110.

  62. Calasso, Roberto,Literature and the Gods (London: Vintage, 2001), p.8. Hereafter LG.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Heidegger, Martin,Parmenides (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992), pp.103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ricoeur, Paul, ‘Manifestation and Proclamation’, inFiguring the Sacred, ed. M.I. Wallace (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995), p.52.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark,Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981), p.40 andpassim.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Heidegger, Martin,Schelling’s Treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom (Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1985), p.81.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Klein, E.,A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language (London: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1971), p.650.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid., p.350, p.827.

  69. Ibid., p.198.

  70. Calasso, op. cit., p.8 andpassim.

  71. Klein, op. cit., p.317.

  72. Ibid., p.635.

  73. Ibid., p.365.

  74. Ibid., p.319.

  75. Calasso, op. cit., p.39.

  76. Steiner, George,Heidegger (London: Fontana, 1982), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Heidegger, Martin,An Introduction to Metaphysics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), pp. 125–132, p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Young, ‘Stealing the Voice of Orpheus’, p. 1.

  79. This was the premise of the 1981 film,The Gods Must Be Crazy. See Uys, Jamie,The Gods Must Be Crazy (Marina Del Rey: Trimark, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Heidegger,Poetry, Language, Thought, p.181.

  81. Ibid., p.182.

  82. Heidegger, Martin, ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, inMartin Heidegger: Basic Writings, pp.311–341.

  83. Heidegger,An Introduction to Metaphysics, p.51.

  84. Heidegger, ‘The Question Conceming Technology’, pp.311–341.

  85. Urry, John, ‘Mobility and Proximity’,Sociology 26 2 (2002): 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Otto, op. cit., pp.43–44, pp.116–124.

  87. Heidegger,Being and Time, p.33 andpassim.

  88. Heidegger,Introduction to Metaphysics, p.202.

  89. Zimmerman, Michael E.,Heidegger’s Confrontation With Modernity (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), pp.260ff.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Dreyfus,Being-in-the-World, pp. 189–191.

  91. Foucault, Michel,The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language, trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith (New York: Panthon Books, 1973), p.216.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Foucault, Michel, ‘Disciplinary Power and Subjection’, inPower, ed. Steven Lukes (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983), pp.229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Foucault, Michel, ‘Ethics of the Concern for the Self as a Practice of Freedom’, trans. P. Aranov and D. McGrawth, inEthics: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, ed. Paul Rabinow (Ringwood: Penguin Books, 2000), pp.281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Berstein, Richard J., Foucault, ‘Critique as a PhilosophicalEthos, inThe New Constellation: The Ethico-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1992), p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Heidegger,Parmenides, p.70.

  96. Gare, Arran,Postmodernism and the Environmental Crisis (London: Routledge, 1995), pp.97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Descombes, Vincent,Modern French Philosophy, trans. L. Scott-Fox and J.M. Harding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Frankel, Boris,From Prophets Deserts Come (Melbourne: Boris Frankel and Arena Publishing, 1992), pp.214–216, pp.323–325, andpassim. It is difficult to assess whether or not Frankel is attacking Foucault himself, or his Anglo-Saxon disciples. In some cases (pp.323–324), the charges do not fit with many of Foucault’s writings, though the latter’s unsystematic style makes it difficult to defend a central position. In either case, Frankel rightly suggests that the Foucauldian focus on micro-hnalytics and micro-resistance in the social domain has undermined Left scholarship andpraxis. It has deprived them of the capacity to think systematically about the destruction of Australian society at the hands of globalizing neoliberalism, and the dissolution of radical economic, political and social alternatives to this neoliberalism.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Maclntyre, Alasdair,Three Rival Version of Moral lnquiry (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990), pp.49–55, pp.206–210, pp.212–213.

    Google Scholar 

  100. On the unity of local and global, see: Hayles, N. Katherine, ‘The Politics of Chaos: Local Knowledge Versus Global Theory’, inChaos Bound (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990), pp.202–235. On the ambivalence of non-systematicity in Foucault, see: Berstein, 'Foucault: Critique as a PhilosophicalEthos, pp.142–171. On the creative mutuality between agency and structure, see Clegg, Stewart R.,Frameworks of Power (London: Sage, 1989), pp.l–20, pp.149–186.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Castoriadis, Cornelius, ‘The Retreat From Autonomy: Post-Modernism as Generalized Conformism’,Democracy and Nature 7 1 (2001): 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Castoriadis, Cornelius, ‘Institution and Autonomy’, inA Critical Sense: Interviews with Intellectuals, ed. Peter Osborne (London: Routledge, 1996), p.12; Castoriadis, Cornelius, ‘Democracy as Procedure and Democracy as Regime’, trans. David Ames Curtis,Constellations 4 1 (1997): 2–3. Here Castoriadis positions himself against Heidegger, emphasizing the distinctness and complexity of each word, rather than the ontological structure of the worldper se. However, it is difficult to see how the two are incompatible, considering that the development of each particular world can be well-characterized by the articulation of ‘world’ in Heidegger. On the various meanings of ‘world’ in Heidegger’s works, see Dreyfus,Being-in-the-World, pp.89–91. On the world as the specific history of a people, see Heidegger, Martin, ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’, inMartin Heidegger: Basic Writings, p. 174..

    Google Scholar 

  103. Castoriadis, ‘Institution and Autonomy’, p.9.

  104. This is summarized in Castoriadis, Cornelius,The Imaginary Constitution of Society, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), pp.369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Heidegger,Parmenides, pp.95–96; Castoriadis, Cornelius, ‘The Greek Polis and the Creation of Democracy’, inThe Castoriadis Reader, ed. David Ames Curtis (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1997), pp.267–289. Castoriadis takes issue with the idea, implied in Heideggerian terminology, that disclosure entails something pre-existing the act itself; that there is a concrete possibility prior to its unveiling. See Castoriadis,The Imaginary Constitution of Society, pp. 198–199.

  106. Castoriadis, ‘The Retreat From Autonomy: Post-Modernism as Generalized Conformism’, pp.21–24.

  107. Adams, Suzi, ‘Castoriadis’ Shill TowardsPhysis, Thesis Eleven 74 (2003): 105–112. If Adams’ interpretation of Castoriadis is correct, Castoriadis not only recognized the relevance ofphysis to process-oriented philosophy, but also appreciated developments in the fields of complex processes research, hierarchy theory and biosemiotics. On the relationships between these and society, see Gare, Arran, ‘Human Ecology and Public Policy: Overcoming the Hegemony of Economics’,Democracy and Nature 8 1 (2002): 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. This is most concisely expressed in Castoriadis, ‘The GreekPolis and the Creation of Democracy’.

  109. Derrida, Jacques, ‘Structure, Sign and Play’, inWriting and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (London: Routledge, 2001), pp.351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Heidegger,Being and Time, pp.279ff.

  111. Young, ‘Not Easy Being Green’, pp. 189–204.

  112. Foucault, ‘Ethics of the Concern for the Self as a Practice of Freedom’, pp.288–289. Of course, Foucault does not phrase this in Heideggerian terms.

  113. Heidegger,Being and Time, pp.296–299ff, p.308ff, p.344, p.394.

  114. Young, '‘The Mortal Blessings of Narrative’.

  115. Heidegger,Poetry, Language, Thought, p. 178.

  116. Ibid., pp.149–151, pp.178–179.

  117. Ibid., p.150, p.178.

  118. Kazantzakis, op. cit., p.550.

  119. I am using ‘structure’ tentatively, as the word lends the fourfold’s mirroring play more solidity than it warrants. Without drawing on the kind of poetic language Heidegger adores, it is difficult to find a word for Being that does justice to it.

  120. Rosa, Hartmut, ‘On defining the Good Life: Liberal Freedom and Capitalist Necessity’,Constellations 5 2 (1998): 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Heidegger, Martin,Schelling’s Treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1985), p.88.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Arendt, Hannah,The Human Condition (New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1958), pp.178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Castoriadis, ‘The GreekPolis and the Creation of Democracy’, pp. 273–275.

  124. Young, Damon A., ‘The Democratic Chorus: Culture, Dialogue and PolyphonicPaideia’,Democracy and Nature 9 2 (2003): 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Castoriadis, ‘Democracy as Procedure and Democracy as Regime’, pp.l–5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Melbourne, 3010, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Damon A. Young

Authors
  1. Damon A. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, D.A. Being grateful for being: Being, reverence and finitude. SOPHIA 44, 31–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912429

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912429

Keywords

Search

Navigation