Skip to main content
Log in

The Final Days: The Development of Argumentative Discourse in the Soviet Union

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Aslund, A. and M.B. Olcott (eds.): 1999, Russia After Communism, CarnegieEndowment for International Peace, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aune, J.: 1994, Rhetoric and Marxism, WestviewPress, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barner-Barry, C. and C. Hody: 1995, The Politics of Change: The Transformation of theFormer Soviet Union, St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.F.: 1980, The Soviet Union since Stalin,Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J.I.: 1996, Eco-nationalism: Anti-nuclear Activism andNational Identity in Russia, Lithuania, and Ukraine, Duke University Press, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demokratizatsiya: 1998,From Gorbachev's Communism to Yeltsin's Capitalism, 6:3.

  • Ellman, M. and V. Kontorovich: 1998,The Destruction of the Soviet Economic System, An Insider's History, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evseev, V.S.: 1980, Partijnoe vozdejstvie pressy [The Influence of the Press in Support of the Party], Izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, L.B. and T.O. Windt: 1991, The Cold War as Rhetoric. TheBeginnings, 1945–1950, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, G.D.: 1972, Soviet PoliticalIndoctrination. Developments in Mass Media and Propaganda Since Stalin, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, J.F.:1997, Democratization and Revolution in the USSR 1985–1991, The Brookings Institution Press, Washinton, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiyama, J., M. Launer, I. Likhachova, D. Williams and M. Young: 1997,‘Russian Electoral Politics and the Search for National Identity’, Argumentation and Advocacy 34, 90–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, L.: 1986, ‘Soviet Propaganda: On the Offensive in the 1980's’,in R.F. Staar (ed.), Public Diplomacy. USA Versus USSR. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 18–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, C.L.: 1974, ‘Thoreau and Civil Disobedience: A Rhetorical Paradox’, QuarterlyJournal of Speech 60(3), 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenez, P.: 1985, The Birth of the Propaganda State. SovietMethods of Mass Mobilization, 1917–1929, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launer, M.K.:1989, US and Soviet Government-Sponsored Broadcasting: A Symbiotic Relationship? at The Future of International Broadcasting in the Age of Glasnost, a Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge conference.

  • Lentini, P. (ed.):1995, Elections and Political Order in Russia, Central European University Press, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, B.:1989, Discourse and the Construction of Society, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, M.:2000, ‘The Russian State Duma, On-Stage and Off: Inquiry, Impeachment, and Opposition’, Demokratizatsiya 8(2), 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marples, D.R.: 1986, Chernobyl and Nuclear Power in the USSR,St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuz, R.: 1963, ‘TV News in the Framework of TelevisionPolitical Programmes’, Radio and Television 2, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaul, M.: 1997, Russia's 1996Presidential Election: The End of Polarized Politics, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, Trans. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame. RFE/RL: April 1984, The Korean Airline Incident. Western Radio and Soviet Perceptions. Soviet Area Audience and Opinion Research, AR 4-84.

  • Schools, Fred and Ann C. Bigelow(eds.): 1996, Russia's Parliamentary Elections 1993 and 1995. Current Digest Soviet/Russian domestic policy series. The Current Digest of Soviet Press, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siefert, M. (ed.): 1991, Mass Culture andPerestroika in the Soviet Union, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, R.: 1998, WhyDid the Soviet Union Collapse? Understanding Historical Change, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, David et al.: 1997, ‘The Role of Public Argument in Emerging Democracies: A Case Study of the 12 December 1993 Elections in the Russian Federation’, Argumentation 13, 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.J. andM.K. Launer: 1989, Flights of Fancy, Flight of Doom. KAL 007 and Soviet-American Rhetoric, University Press of America, Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.J. and M.K. Launer: 1991, ‘Redefining Glasnost' in theSoviet Media: The Recontextualization of Chernobyl’, Journal of Communication Spring 41(2), 102–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, M.J., Launer, M.K. The Final Days: The Development of Argumentative Discourse in the Soviet Union. Argumentation 16, 443–458 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021119728900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021119728900

Keywords

Navigation