Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Development of Advanced Technology: A Postmodern Stakeholder Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zygmunt Bauman is arguably the most well-known theorist in postmodern ethics. He argues that to develop and enforce universal ethical laws or codes leads to an abdication of individual moral responsibility. Actors rely on external rules and a rational consideration of costs and benefits rather than on moral impulse. In order to recognize and act upon moral impulse, the moral agent must both recognize and understand the Other. We operationalize these ideas, applying them to the development of advanced information technology (AIT) in organizations. We propose that a stakeholder theory of enabling can be used to formulate processes that will give form and voice to the Other by providing mechanisms for face-to-face interactions and dialogue. Applying the principles of affirmative postmodern ethics through an enabling stakeholder oriented system development process explicitly allows for the examination of moral concerns which might otherwise be overlooked, ignored, or silenced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachrach, Peter and M. Baratz: 1970, Power and Poverty. Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Richard: 1996, ‘Accounting Ethics: The Search for Truth in an Age of Moral Relativism’ Research on Accounting Ethics 2.

  • Bauman, Zygmunt: 1993, Postmodern Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., A. Giddens and S. Lash: 1994, Reflexive Modernization (Stanford University Press, Stanford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D., R. Gephart and T. Thatchenkery (eds.): 1996, Postmodern Management and Organization Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. and P. Cochran: 1991, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Theory and Research’ in Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society (Sundance, UT), pp. 449–467.

  • Burrell, G.: 1997, Pandemonium (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calton, J. and N. Kurland: 1996, ‘A Theory of Stakeholder Enabling’ in D. Boje, R. Gephart and T. Thatchenkery (eds.), Postmodern Management and Organization Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 154–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S.: 1995, Transforming Communication, Transforming Business: Building Responsive and Responsible Workplaces (State University of New York Press, Albany).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee: 1994, ‘Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory’ Academy of Management Review 19(2), 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. and R. Freeman: 1993, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’ in T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 4th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, A. and A. Venkatesh: 1993, ‘Postmodernity: The Age of Marketing’ International Journal of Research in Marketing 10, 227–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. and W. Evan: 1990, ‘Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation’ Journal of Business Economics 19(4), 337–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony: 1990, The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford University Press, Stanford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’ Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, C.: 1994, ‘Defining the Post-bureaucratic Type’ in C. Heckscher and A. Donnellon (eds.), The Post-bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 14–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydebrand, W.: 1989, ‘New Organizational Forms’ Work and Occupations 16(3), 323–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. and P. Miller (eds.): 1994, Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, J. and S. Brenner: 1992, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: A Methodology to Generate Value Matrix Weights’ Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, Michael: 1985, ‘Is Nothing Sacred? The Ethics of Television’ Daedalus 114(5), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, M. J.: 1993, An Ethic of Care (Routledge Chapman and Hall, Great Britain).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1991, ‘The Impact of Science Studies on Political Philosophy’ Science, Technology and Human Values 16(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K.: 1992, ‘The Politics of Polysemy: Television News, Everyday Consciousness and Political Action’ in P. Scannell, P. Schlesinger and C. Sparks (eds.), Culture and Power: Media, Culture and Society Reader (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard: 1989, Contingency, Solidarity, and Irony (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, Pauline: 1992, Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, G.: 1994, ‘Rational Interaction for Moral Sensitivity: A Postmodern Approach to Moral Decision Making in Business’ Journal of Business Ethics 13(11), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tester, K.: 1994, Media, Morality, and Society (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, C.: 1993, ‘Business Ethics and Postmodernism: A Dangerous Alliance’ Business Ethics Quarterly 3, 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuthas, K., Dillard, J.F. Ethical Development of Advanced Technology: A Postmodern Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 19, 35–49 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006145805087

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006145805087

Keywords

Navigation