Skip to main content
Log in

Adhocracy, security and responsibility: Revisiting Abu Ghraib a decade later

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

This article examines the acts of detainee abuse that took place at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq from the standpoint of organization theory. Instead of seeing Abu Ghraib as a failure of bureaucracy, I show that the prison is emblematic of a different organizational model – adhocracy – that places greater emphasis on the delegation of improvisation and practical judgment to low-level operators. I argue that that there is an intimate connection between adhocracies and the kind of security apparatus put in place by Coalition forces in Iraq, that the space of their encounter is potentially dangerous, and that adhocracies demand a distinctive approach to questions of individual responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (2005) State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2011) Population and affective perception: Biopolitics and anticipatory action in US counterinsurgency doctrine. Antipode 43 (2): 205–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, C., Lobo-Guerrero, L. and Van Munster, R. (2008) Security, technologies of risk, and the political. Security Dialogue 39 (2–3): 147–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, A. (2012) Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Facade of American Empire, 1898–2001. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. and Tsoukala, A. (2008) Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes after 9/11. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2007) Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Waever, O. and Wilde, J.D. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caton, S.C. and Zacka, B. (2010) Abu Ghraib, the security apparatus, and the performativity of power. American Ethnologist 37 (2): 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danner, M. (2004) Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror. New York: New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. and Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2008) Biopolitics of security in the 21st century: An introduction. Review of International Studies 34 (2): 265–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J.M. and Murphy, D. (2007) From My Lai to Abu Ghraib: The moral psychology of atrocity. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (1): 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, E.C. and Cons, J. (2014) Aleatory sovereignty and the rule of sensitive spaces. Antipode 46 (1): 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenman, S.F. (2007) The Abu Ghraib Effect. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. (2010) Foucault’s legacy: Security, war and violence in the 21st century. Security Dialogue 41 (4): 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D.A. (2013) Enforcing Order: An Ethnography of Urban Policing. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, M.G.G.R. (2004) AR 15-6 Investigation of the Abu Ghraib Detention Facility and 205th Military Intelligence Brigade. Investigation for the U.S. Army Combined Joint Task Force.

  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, P. and Morris, E. (2008) Standard Operating Procedure. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graveline, C. and Clemens, M. (2010) The Secrets of Abu Ghraib Revealed: American Soldiers on Trial. Washington DC: Potomac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B.L.T., Nystrom, P.C. and Starbuck, W.H. (1976) Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, S.M. (2004) Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (2006) The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K. and Williams, M.C. (1996) Broadening the agenda of security studies: Politics and methods. Mershon International Studies Review 40 (2): 229–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krulak, C.C. (1999) The strategic corporal: Leadership in the Three Block War. Marines 28 (1): 26.

  • Lipsky, M. (2010) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. (2008) The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. and Mchugh, A. (1985) Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (2): 160–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W.J.T. (2005) The unspeakable and the unimaginable: Word and image in a time of terror. ELH 72 (2): 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na’aman, O. (2012) The checkpoint: Terror, power, and cruelty. Boston Review 37 (4): 38–45.

  • Peoples, C. and Vaughan-Williams, N. (2010) Critical Security Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W.E. (2008) Torture and the new paradigm of warfare. Constellations 15 (4): 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooner, S. (2005) Contractor atrocities at Abu Ghraib: Compromised accountability in a streamlined, outsourced government. Standford Law and Policy Review 16 (2): 549–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate Armed Services Committee (2008) United States Congress (110th Cong., 2nd sess.), Senate Armed Services Committee, Report: Inquiry into the Treatment of Detainees in U.S. Custody.

  • Simon, H. (1976) Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.W. (2005) Outsourcing war. Foreign Affairs 84 (2): 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spire, A. (2008) Accueillir ou Reconduire: Enquête sur les Guichets de l’Immigration. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, D. (2005) What’s wrong with torture? Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguba, A. (2004) 15–6 Investigation of the 800th Military Police Brigade (Taguba Report).

  • Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1979) Bureaucracy. In: H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1981) The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology 87 (3): 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q. (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J. (2003) Re: Military interrogation of alien unlawful combatants held outside the United States. Memorandum issued by the Office of Legal Counsel, US Department of Justice.

  • Zimbardo, P. (2007) The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this article were presented at conferences at Harvard, UCLA, Columbia and Notre-Dame. For their helpful comments and criticism, I thank Tal Arbel, Steven Caton, Prithvi Datta, Michael Frazer, Sean Ingham, Pablo Kalmanovitz, Matthew Landauer, Yascha Mounk, Oded Na’aman, Melodie Chika Ogawa, Sabeel Rahman, Michael Rosen, Nancy Rosenblum, Elaine Scarry and Andrea Tivig. I am also grateful to Samuel Chambers and two anonymous reviewers at Contemporary Political Theory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zacka, B. Adhocracy, security and responsibility: Revisiting Abu Ghraib a decade later. Contemp Polit Theory 15, 38–57 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2015.21

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2015.21

Keywords

Navigation