Skip to main content
Log in

Demystifying Fair Trade in France: The History of an Ambiguous Project

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In France, Fair Trade arrived on the scene in the late twentieth century, and since then has passed through several experimental phases before becoming an enduring “realistic” economic alternative. To understand the transformation, this article defines Fair Trade as a social construct issues and tensions of which change depending on the point of entry. By conducting a secondary analysis of several data sets from varied sources, including documentary material, interviews, and observations, the authors trace the history of Fair Trade in France, define its introduction as a system, describe its institutionalization, and contribute to a greater understanding of how its ideals have changed and become more professional over time. The analyses reveal that the term “Fair Trade” has become ambiguous, spanning divergent and conflicting ideas and projects, including opening and closing conventional market systems and alter-globalization and anti-globalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bécheur, A. and Toulouse, N.: 2008, Le commerce équitable: entre utopie et marché. (Paris, Vuibert).

    Google Scholar 

  • Béji-Bécheur, A., Diaz Pedregal, V., and Ozcaglar-Toulouse, N.: 2008, ‘Fair Trade–Just How ‘Fair’ Are the Exchanges?’, Journal of Macromarketing 28-1, 44-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L.: 2006, On Justification. The Economies of Worth. (Princeton, Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M.: 2004, Bioregionalism and Civil Society: Democratic Challenges to Corporate Globalism. (UBC, Press Vancouver).

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjeux, D.: 2004, Les Sciences Sociales. (Paris, PUF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Pedregal, V. and N. Ozcaglar-Toulouse: 2009, ‘L’institutionnalisation du commerce équitable: l’émergence d’une législation relative à un commerce différent’, in C. Eberhart (ed.), Traduire nos responsabilités planétaires. Recomposer nos paysages juridiques (Bruylant, Bruxelles), pp. 473–490.

  • Durkheim, E.: 1997, The Division of Labor in Society. (New York, Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gateau, M.: 2008, ‘Quelle(s) stratégie(s) de distribution pour les produits équitables? Le cas Français ou la difficile alliance entre logique militante et logique commerciale’, économie et Solidarités 37-2, 109-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselbladh, H. and Kallinikos, J.: 2000, ‘The Project of Rationalization : A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies’, Organization Studies 21-4, 697-720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havard Duclos, B. and Nicourd, S.: 2005, Pourquoi s’engager? Bénévoles et militants dans les associations de solidarité (Paris, Payot).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herth, A.: 2005, ‘Propositions pour le développement du commerce équitable en France’, Rapport remis à l’ancien Premier Ministre Jean-Pierre Raffarin, Mission parlementaire auprès du Ministre délégué aux PME, au Commerce, à l’Artisanat, aux Professions libérales et à la Consommation.

  • IPSOS/Max Havelaar France: 2007, ‘Baromètre de notoriété: les Français et le commerce équitable’, mars.

  • Krier, J.-M.: 2005, Fair Trade in Europe 2005. Facts and Figures from Fair Trade in 25 European countries’, Report for EFTA, FLO, IFAT and NEWS (Brussels).

  • Low, W. and Davenport, E.: 2005, ‘Postcards from the Edge: Maintaining the “Alternative” Character of Fair Trade’, Sustainable Development 13, 143-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max Havelaar France: 2006, ‘Rapport Annuel’, http://www.maxhavelaarfrance.org/.

  • Moore, G.: 2004, ‘The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, Issues and Future Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 53, 73-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moquet, A.-C. and Pezet, A.: 2006, ‘Les technologies de la responsabilité sociétale ou l’invention du manager responsable – Le cas Lafarge’, Revue Finance-Contrôle-Stratégie 9-4, 113-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neamtan, N.: 2003, ‘L’économie solidaire comme radicalisation de la démocratie’, Revue du MAUSS 21, 126-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L., Murray, D., and Wilkinson, J. (eds.): 2007, Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalisation. (New York, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanou, C.: 1991, Fonctionnaires et militantsL’administration et les nouveaux mouvements sociaux (L’Harmattan, Paris).

  • Taylor, P.: 2005, ‘In the Market But Not of It: Fair Trade Coffee and Forest Stewardship Council Certification as Market-Based Social Change’, World Development, 33-1, 129-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 1971, Economie et Société. (Paris, Plon).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nil Özçağlar-Toulouse.

Additional information

Dr. Özçağlar-Toulouse is the lead author of this article. The other authors’ names are listed alphabetically: each contributed equally to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özçağlar-Toulouse, N., Béji-Bécheur, A., Gateau, M. et al. Demystifying Fair Trade in France: The History of an Ambiguous Project. J Bus Ethics 92 (Suppl 2), 205–216 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0579-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0579-x

Key words

Navigation