Abstract
College students rated the likelihood of recall of individual words presented for free recall learning. Predictions were made using a 7-point scale immediately following an item’s presentation in the list. To-be-rated items included those presented one time, as well as items presented twice in either a massed (MP) or distributed (DP) manner. Twice-presented items were rated as more likely to be recalled than items presented once, and they were; MP items were judged more likely to be recalled than DP items, but they were not. The finding that subjects think that they know MP items when they do not suggests why processing may be less for massed than for distributed presentations. As such, these results provide support for the attenuation of attention hypothesis of the spacing effect in free recall.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbuckle, T. Y., & Cuddy, L. L. Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81, 126–131.
Glenberg, A. M. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 1979, 7, 95–112.
Groninger, L. D. Predicting recall: The “feeling-that-I-will- know” phenomenon. American Journal of Psychology, 1979, 92, 45–58.
Hintzman, D. L. Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Hintzman, D. L. Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1976.
Hintzman, D. L., Summers, J. J., Eki, N. T., & Moore, M. D. Voluntary attention and the spacing effect. Memory & Cognition, 1975, 3, 576–580.
Jacoby, L. L. On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978, 17, 649–667.
Johnston, W. A., & Uhl, C. N. The contribution of encoding effort and variability to the spacing effect on free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976, 2, 153–160.
Peterson, L. R., Wampler, R., Kirkpatrick, M., & Saltzman, D. Effect of spacing presentations on retention of a paired associate over short intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 206–209.
Shaughnessy, J. J. Persistence of the spacing effect in free recall under varying incidental learning conditions. Memory & Cognition, 1976, 4, 369–377.
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zimmerman, J., & Underwood, B. J. Further evidence on the MP-DP effect in free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 1–12.
Spreen, O., & Schulz, R. W. Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronunciability for 329 nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 459–468.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was reported at the 15th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, 1974.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zechmeister, E.B., Shaughnessy, J.J. When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don’t. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 15, 41–44 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329756
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329756