Abstract
In this paper, I demonstrate how the Passover Haggadah exploits certain features of conversational interaction in both the production formats of its texts and in its performance formats (or ways it indicates it should be performed) during the Passover Seder. Some conversational methods used include the use of dispreferred second pair parts which creates an impression that at least part of the Haggadah's text resembles a kind of conversational argument. Furthermore, as a recitable text, the Haggadah exploits the use of and changes in footings in a manner reminiscent of how reported speech is used in ordinary conversation to introduce participant roles and virtual participants with their own commitments, orientations and positions which may not represent those of the animators of the recited text. While the Haggadah is not an actual argument in conventional terms, it is a script of ritual texts organized according to a logic similar to the one by which certain kinds of conversational arguments are organized. Participants are able to animate participatory roles and assess the positions, orientations and commitments such roles represent in a manner that rehearses how such positions, orientations and commitments might be accomplished in actual argumentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bauman, R.: 1992, 'Contextualization, Tradition, and the Dialogue of Genres: Icelandic Legends of the Kraftaskáld', in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bell, C.: 1992, Ritual Theory Ritual Practice, Oxford University Press, New York.
Byarin, D.: 1990, Intertextuality and the Reading of Midrash, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Bronstein, H. (ed.): 1984, A Passover Haggadah, Central Conference of American Rabbis, New York.
Burke, K.: 1953, Counter-Statement, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Clayman, S.: 1992, 'Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News-interview Discourse', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
van Eemeren, F., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Elias, J. (ed.): 1977, The Haggadah: Passover Haggadah with Translation and a New Commentary Based on Talmudic, Midrashic and Rabbinic Sources, Mesorah Publications Ltd., New York.
Fisher, W. R.: 1987, Human Communication As Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
Fredman, R. G.: 1981, The Passover Seder: Afikoman in Exile, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Geertz, C.: 1980, Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth Century Bali, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Giddens, A.: 1984, The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Giddens, A.: 1993, New Rules of Sociological Method, Second Edition, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Glatzer, N. (ed.): 1989, The Passover Haggadah: Introduction and Commentary Based on the Studies of E. D. Goldschmidt, Schoken Books, New York.
Goffman, E.: 1981, Forms of Talk, Blackwell, Oxford.
Goodwin, C. and A. Duranti: 1992, 'Rethinking Context: an Introduction', in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Heritage, J.: 1989, 'Current Developments in Conversation Analysis', in D. Roger and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation, Multilingual Matters Ltd., Clevedon.
Iser, W.: 1978, The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Iser, W.: 1980, 'The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach', in J. P. Tompkins (ed.), Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-structuralism, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Jackson, S. and S. Jacobs: 1980, 'Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme', The Quarterly Journal of Speech 66, 251-265.
Jacobs, S. and S. Jackson: 1981, 'Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation', Western Journal of Speech Communication 45, 118-132.
Jacobs, S. and S. Jackson: 1982, 'Conversational Argument: A Discourse Analytic Approach', in R. Cox and C. A. Willard (eds.), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
Jacobs, S. and S. Jackson: 1983, 'Strategy and Structure in Conversational Influence Attempts', Communications Monographs 50, 285-304.
Jacobs, S. and S. Jackson: 1989, 'Building a Model of Conversational Argument', in B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O. Keefe and E. Wartella (eds.), Rethinking Communication Volume 2 Paradigm Exemplars, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
Kugel, J. L.: 1987, 'Torah', in A. A. Cohen and P. Mendes-Flohr (eds.), Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought: Original Essays on Critical Concepts, Movements, and Beliefs, Free Press, New York.
Lake, R.: 1990, 'The Implied Arguer', in D. C. Williams and M. D. Hazen (eds.), Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric of Assent, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Levinson, S.: 1985, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lyons, J.: 1977, Semantics, Vols. 1 and 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Second Edition, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Mitchell, D. B.: 1994, 'Distinctions Between Everyday and Representation Communication', Communication Theory 4, 111-131
O'Keefe, D. J.: 1977, 'Two Concepts of Argument', Journal of the American Forensic Association, 13, 121-128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zemel, A. The Passover Haggadah as Argument, Or Why Is This Text Different from Other Texts?. Argumentation 12, 57–77 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007751521984
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007751521984