Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

When and Why Do Good People Not Do Good Deeds? Third-Party Observers’ Unfavorable Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A small but growing body of research suggests that witnessing mistreatment affects third-party observers’ attitudes and behaviors. Based on the framework of belief in a just world theory, this study examines perverse secondary victimization which is particularly pervasive in negative workplace gossip from a third-party perspective but has nonetheless received little attention in organizational research. We present a moderated mediation model and hypothesize that third-party observers’ deservingness judgment would mediate the effect of observed negative workplace gossip and interact with their just world beliefs (BJW) in predicting their unfavorable reactions toward the target (i.e., withholding target support, engaging in target exclusion, or target negative gossip). Additionally, an observer’s BJW would exacerbate the positive relationship between observed negative workplace gossip and deservingness judgment, that is, third-party observers with high BJW are more susceptible to victim derogation bias and consider that the target of gossip deserved the victimization experience to maintain their worldview. Data were collected from 210 full-time employees through online questionnaires and the empirical results supported the hypotheses. The study discusses the theoretical and practical implications of the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target's perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 642–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2640–2670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J. R., Stewart, S. L., Johnston, M., Banks, P., & Fobair, P. (2001). Sources of support and the physical and mental well-being of young women with breast cancer. Social Science and Medicine, 53(11), 1513–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes-Sperry, L., & O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2005). To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 288–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Liang, L. H. (2017). Moving beyond assumptions of deviance: The reconceptualization and measurement of workplace gossip. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla, M., & Riva, P. (2016). Predicting pleasure at others’ misfortune: Morality trumps sociability and competence in driving deservingness and schadenfreude. Motivation and Emotion, 41(2), 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., & Raja, S. (1999). Secondary victimization of rape victims: Insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence and Victims, 14(3), 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Preventing the “Second rape”: Rape survivors' experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(12), 1239–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, G., and Robinson, S. L. (2009). They’re talking about me again: The impact of being the target of gossip on emotional distress and withdrawal. In: Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference. Chicago.

  • Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74–95). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2008). School bullying: Belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims, and defenders. European Psychologist, 13(4), 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., Kamble, S. V., & Dalbert, C. (2009). Belief in a just world and well-being of bullies, victims and defenders: A study with Portuguese and Indian students. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 22(5), 497–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Belief in a just world-validation correlates of 2 scales. Psychologische Beitrage, 29(4), 596–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSimone, J. A., & Harms, P. D. (2018). Dirty data: The effects of screening respondents who provide low-quality data in survey research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(5), 559–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donat, M., Umlauft, S., Dalbert, C., & Kamble, S. V. (2012). Belief in a just world, teacher justice, and bullying behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 38(3), 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducharme, L. J., & Martin, J. K. (2000). Unrewarding work, coworker support, and job satisfaction. Work and Occupations, 27(2), 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2006). The belief in a just world and subjective well-being in old age. Aging and Mental Health, 10(5), 439–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwardt, L., Labianca, G. J., & Wittek, R. (2012). Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work? A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Social Networks, 34(2), 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality Social Psychology Review, 3(2), 86–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 38–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25(3), 656–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., & Keltner, D. (2012). The virtues of gossip: reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1015–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Y., & Halali, E. (2017). Regulating “good” people in subtle conflicts of interest situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1), 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as a moral virtue. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (2nd ed., pp. 13–14). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

  • Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, and D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (2nd ed., pp. 3–33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

  • Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., & Eissa, G. (2012). Bottom-line mentality as an antecedent of social undermining and the moderating roles of core self-evaluations and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., & Priesemuth, M. (2013). To act out, to withdraw, or to constructively resist? Employee reactions to supervisor abuse of customers and the moderating role of employee moral identity. Human Relations, 66(7), 925–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosser, T. J., Lopez-Kidwell, V., & Labianca, G. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group and Organization Management, 35(2), 177–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavioral Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., & Bhatnagar, N. (2017). When fellow customers behave badly: Witness reactions to employee mistreatment by customers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(11), 1528–1544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., Neville, L., Reich, T. C., Christie, A. M., Cortina, L. M., & Shan, J. V. (2017). Witnessing wrongdoing: The effects of observer power on incivility intervention in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142, 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupre, K. E., Inness, M., et al. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitlan, R. T., & Noel, J. (2009). The influence of workplace exclusion and personality on counterproductive work behaviours: An interactionist perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(4), 477–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karademas, E. C. (2006). Self-efficacy, social support and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1281–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, S. M. (1993). Portrait of the gossip as a young (wo)man: Form and content of gossip among junior high school students, unpublished doctoral dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, C. C., Wu, C. Y., & Lin, C. W. (2018). Supervisor workplace gossip and its impact on employees. Journal of managerial psychology, 33(1), 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 428–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Pillutla, M., & Law, K. S. (2000). Power-distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26(4), 685–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer's reactions, to the "innocent victim": Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFerran, B., Aquino, K., & Duffy, M. (2010). How personality and moral identity relate to individuals’ ethical ideology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, G., & Mouly, V. S. (2004). Do loose lips sink ships? Corporate Communications, 9(3), 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., Baer, M. D., Ambrose, M. L., Folger, R., & Palmer, N. F. (2018). Cheating under pressure: A self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(1), 54–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2012). Beyond the consequences to the victim: The impact of abusive supervision on third party observers. In R. A. Giacalone & M. D. Promislo (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: Implications for individual well-being (pp. 21–43). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015). Third parties' reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1040–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.), Muthén and Muthén: Los Angeles, CA.

  • O'Reilly, J., Aquino, K., & Skarlicki, D. (2016). The lives of others: Third parties' responses to others' injustice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priesemuth, M. (2013). Stand Up and Speak Up: Employees' Prosocial Reactions to Observed Abusive Supervision. Business and Society, 52(4), 649–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., & Bell, C. M. (2010). Extending the deontic model of justice: Moral self-regulation in third-party responses to injustice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Cropanzano, R., & Rupp, D. E. (2002). Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 881–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, P., Li, A., & Mawritz, M. (2018). Self-protective reactions to peer abusive supervision: The moderating role of prevention focus and the mediating role of performance instrumentality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(1), 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. T. (2005). Third-party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 183–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Turner, R. A. (2014). Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(1), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Ellard, J. H., & Kelln, B. R. C. (1998). Third-party perceptions of a layoff: Procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 839–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, W. W., Goslinga, S., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2008). Impact of responsibility for a misfortune on schadenfreude and sympathy: Further evidence. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(5), 631–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Goslinga, S., & Nieweg, M. (2005). Deservingness and Schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 19(6), 933–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2015). When does gossip promote generosity? Indirect reciprocity under the shadow of the future. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 923–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2016). Gossip versus punishment: The efficiency of reputation to promote and maintain cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6, 23919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. Z., Birtch, T. A., Chiang, F. F. T., & Zhang, H. (2018a). Perceptions of negative workplace gossip: A self-consistency theory framework. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1873–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. F., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L. Z., & Ma, J. (2018b). The effect of workplace negative gossip on employee proactive behavior in China: The moderating role of traditionality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 801–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y., Zhu, H., Deng, X., & Mu, Z. (2019). Negative workplace gossip and service outcomes: An explanation from social identity theory. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 82, 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., Aguiar-Quintana, T., & Suárez-Acosta, M. A. (2013). A justice framework for understanding how guests react to hotel employee (mis)treatment. Tourism Management, 36, 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the support provided by National Nature Science Foundation of China (71572164; 71772164), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720181104).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Xiamen University, No. 422, Siming South Road, Xiamen, 361005, Fujian, China

    Xing Zhou & Lele Fan

  2. Zhejiang University of Technology, Xihu District, No. 288, Liuhe Road, Hangzhou, 310023, Zhejiang, China

    Cong Cheng & Yancheng Fan

Authors
  1. Xing Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lele Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cong Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yancheng Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lele Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. This manuscript is not previously published or being considered by another journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Fan, L., Cheng, C. et al. When and Why Do Good People Not Do Good Deeds? Third-Party Observers’ Unfavorable Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip. J Bus Ethics 171, 599–617 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04470-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04470-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation