Skip to main content

Making Solomonoff Induction Effective

Or: You Can Learn What You Can Bound

  • Conference paper
How the World Computes (CiE 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7318))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The notion of effective learnability is analyzed by relating it to the proof-theoretic strength of an axiom system which is used to derive totality proofs for recursive functions. The main result, the generator-predictor theorem, states that an infinite sequence of bits is learnable if the axiom system proves the totality of a recursive function which dominates the time function of the bit sequence generating process.

This result establishes a tight connection between learnability and provability, thus reducing the question of what can be effectively learned to the foundational questions of mathematics with regard to set existence axioms. Results of reverse mathematics are used to illustrate the implications of the generator-predictor theorem by connecting a hierarchy of axiom systems with increasing logical strength to fast growing functions.

Our results are discussed in the context of the probabilistic universal induction framework pioneered by Solomonoff, showing how the integration of a proof system into the learning process leads to naturally defined effective instances of Solomonoff induction. Finally, we analyze the problem of effective learning in a framework where the time scales of the generator and the predictor are coupled, leading to a surprising conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arora, S., Barak, B.: Complexity Theory: A Modern Approach. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, H.: Some systems of second order arithmetic and their use. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vancouver, B.C, vol. 1, pp. 235–242. Canad. Math. Congress, Montreal (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gold, E.M.: Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10(5), 447–474 (1967)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodstein, R.: On the restricted ordinal theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 9, 33–41 (1944)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Huber, F., Schmidt-Petri, C. (eds.): Degrees of Belief. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hutter, M.: The fastest and shortest algorithm for all well-defined problems. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science 13(3), 431–443 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hutter, M.: Universal Artificial Intelligence: Sequential Decisions based on Algorithmic Probability. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Legg, S.: Is There an Elegant Universal Theory of Prediction? In: Balcázar, J.L., Long, P.M., Stephan, F. (eds.) ALT 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4264, pp. 274–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, M., Vitányi, P.M.B.: An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications, 3rd edn. Graduate Texts in Computer Science. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rathjen, M.: The art of ordinal analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, pp. 45–69. Eur. Math. Soc. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simpson, S.G.: Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Solomonoff, R.: A formal theory of inductive inference, part I. Information and Control 7(1), 1–22 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Solomonoff, R.: A formal theory of inductive inference, part II. Information and Control 7(2), 224–254 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Weihrauch, K.: Computable analysis. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmermann, J., Cremers, A.B.: The Quest for Uncertainty. In: Calude, C.S., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Maurer Festschrift. LNCS, vol. 6570, pp. 270–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmermann, J., Cremers, A.B.: Proof-driven learning systems (2012) (preprint)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zimmermann, J., Cremers, A.B. (2012). Making Solomonoff Induction Effective. In: Cooper, S.B., Dawar, A., Löwe, B. (eds) How the World Computes. CiE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7318. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30870-3_75

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30870-3_75

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30869-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30870-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics