Skip to main content
Log in

Pluractionality and Complex Quantifier Formation

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of (surface) DP-internal quantifying expressions on semantic interpretation. In particular, I investigate two syntactic constructions in which an adjective takes scope out of its embedding DP, thus raising an interesting question for strict compositionality. Regarding the first construction, I follow Larson (1999) and assume that the adjective incorporates into the determiner of its DP, forming a complex quantifier [D+A]. I present new evidence in favor of this analysis. Since Larson's semantic analysis of complex quantifiers [D+A] makes a wrong prediction, I propose an alternative, empirically more adequate analysis that treats D+A compounds as pluractional quantifiers in the sense of Lasersohn (1995). Finally, I turn to the second construction, arguing that – despite superficial similarities to the first construction - it should not be analyzed in terms of complex quantifier formation, but in terms of LF-movement of the adjective to Spec,DP. The discussion suggests that there is more than one way for DP-internal modifiers to take DP-external scope in natural language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, 'Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language', Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.: 1967, 'Adjectives in English: Attribution and Predication', Lingua 18, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisson, C.: 1998, Distributivity, Maximality, and Floating Quantifiers, PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.

  • Chierchia, G.: 1998, 'Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter”', in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events in Grammar, pp. 53–103. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1995, The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1967, 'The Logical Form of Action Sentences', in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, pp. 81–95. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P.: 1997, 'Cases, Adverbs, Situations and Events', in H. Kamp and B. Partee (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Context Dependence, IMS, University of Stuttgart.

  • Diesing, M.: 1992, Indefinites. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doetjes, J.: 1997, Quantifiers and Selection. On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doetjes, J. and M. Honcoop: 1997, 'The Semantics of Event-related Readings: A Case for Pair-Quantification', in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 263–310. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, R. and J. Higginbotham: 1981, 'Opacity in NP', Linguistic Analysis 7, 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel: 1994, Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, PhD dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.

  • Frey, W.: 1993, Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation. Ñber Bindung, implizite Argumente und Skopus. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, N.: 1986, A Theory of Category Projection and Its Applications. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Gil, D.: 1995, 'Universal Quantifiers and Distributivity', in E. Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 321–362. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakulinen, A. and F. Karlsson: 1979, Nykysuomen Lauseoppi. Suomalaisen Kirljallisuuden Seura, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, M.: 1995, 'Diachronic Sources of “All” and “Every”', E. Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 363–382. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Heim, I.: 1990, 'E-type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. and A. Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hoop, H.: 1995, 'On the Characterization of the Weak-Strong Distinction', in E. Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 421–450. Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. J.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Kamp, H.: 1981, 'A Theory of Truth and Semantic Interpretation', in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Truth, Interpretation and Information, pp. 1-41. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kayne: 1994, The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • docs/ Console2000pdfs/kaiser.pdf

  • Kiparsky, P.: 1998, 'Partitive Case and Aspect', in M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Y.: 1986, 'More on Bracketing Paradoxes', Linguistic Inquiry, 177–183.

  • Kratzer, A.: 1995, 'Stage-Level & Individual-Level Predicates', G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, pp. 125–175. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1998, 'Scope or Pseudo-Scope? Are There Wide-Scope Indefinites?', in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events in Grammar, pp. 163–196. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1990, 'Four Thousand Ships Passed through the Lock', Linguistics & Philosophy 13, 487–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1998, 'Scope Inversion under the Rise-Fall Contour in German', Linguistic Inquiry, 75–109.

  • Larson, R. K.: 1999, 'Semantics of Adjectival Modification', LOT Winterschool Class Notes, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. K., M. den Dikken and P. Ludlow: 1997, 'Intensional Transitive Verbs and Abstract Clausal Complementation', ms., CUNY and Stony Brook University.

  • Lasersohn, P.: 1995, Plurality, Conjunction and Events, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiss, E.: 2000, Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. deGruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1975, 'Adverbs of Quantification', in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 3–15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1997, 'Ten Years of Research on Plurals - Where Do We Stand?', in F. Hamm and E. Hinrichs (eds.), Plurality and Quantification, pp. 19–54. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1998, '“Je drei Äpfel - Three Apples Each”: Quantification and the German “je”', in G. Link (ed.), Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy, pp. 117–132. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, L.: 1998, Determiner Systems and Quantificational Strategies. Evidence from Salish. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, L.: 2001, 'Quantification and the Nature of Crosslinguistic Variation', Natural Language Semantics 9, 145–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, G.: 1977, 'Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English', Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, F.: 1992, 'Reciprocals and Same/Different. Towards a Semantic Analysis', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 411–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, F.: 1997, Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1973, 'The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English', in K. J. J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, pp. 221–242. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S.: 1990, Descriptions. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafel, J.: 1993, 'Scope and Word Order', in J. Jacobs et al. (eds.), Syntax. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, pp. 867–880. de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafel, J.: 1994, 'Zur syntaktischen Struktur nominaler Quantoren', Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 13, 236–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English. A Study of Subatomic Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1989, 'Many Quantifiers', in J. Powers and K. de Jong (eds.), '88. Linguistics Department, Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T.: 1997, 'Quantifier Scope: How Labor is Divided between QR and Choice-Functions', Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1990, Relativized Minimality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R.: 1967, 'Constraints on Variables in Syntax', PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Russell, B.: 1905, 'On Denoting', Mind 14, 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæbø, K. J.: 1995, 'Quantifiers: Configurations and Interpretations', in F. Hamm, J. Kalb and A. v. Stechow (eds.), The Blaubeuren Papers. Proceedings of the Workshop on Recent Developments in the Theory of Natural Language Semantics, vol. 2, pp. 347–378. Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Tübingen.

  • Schwarzschild, R.: 1992, 'Distinguishing Oriented-Adverbials from Secondary Predicates in the Analysis of Together', talk presented at IATL 1992, Bar-Ilan University.

  • Sharvy, R.: 1980, 'A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions', The Philosophical Review 89, 607–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1990, 'Movement, Agreement, and Case', ms., UCLA.

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1950, 'On Referring', Mind 59, 320–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G.: 1981, 'The Interpretation of Frequency Adjectives', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 221–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, H.: 1991, Adverbs and Quantification: A Generalized Approach, PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.

  • Travis, L.: 1984, Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Zimmermann, M.: 2002, Boys Buying Two Sausages Each. On the Syntax and Semantics of Distance-Distributivity, PhD dissertation, LOT, Utrecht.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmermann, M. Pluractionality and Complex Quantifier Formation. Natural Language Semantics 11, 249–287 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024937316555

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024937316555

Keywords

Navigation