Skip to main content

Equine Driving: Plato, Kant and Fichte on the Teamwork of the Mind

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy
  • 260 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter places the recourse to the concept of drive in the accounts of practical subjectivity in Fichte into the historical and systematic context of Platonic and Kantian thinking about the psycho-politics of self-rule. Part 1 presents Plato’s comparison of the soul’s set-up and manner of operation to a team of horses of opposed character that are driven by a seriously challenged charioteer. Part 2 first addresses Kant’s account of the irrational and rational modes of practical subjectivity and then traces Reinhold’s and Fichte’s appropriation of the concept of drive for detailing the dynamic structure and functionality of the mind’s multiple and competing drives, including the “selfish” and “unselfish drive” in Reinhold and the “natural,” “pure” and “ethical drive” in Fichte.

Everywhere I go I find a poet has been there before me.

—The quotation consistently has been attributed to Sigmund Freud, with no exact citation ever provided—and possible to give.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a digital reproduction, see https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Eos_chariot_430-420_BC_Staatliche_Antikensammlungen.jpg (retrieved 13 September 2020).

  2. 2.

    For a digital reproduction, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charioteer_of_Delphi#/media/File:AurigaDelfi.jpg (retrieved 13 September 2020).

  3. 3.

    For a digital reproduction, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:West_pediment_-_Temple_of_Aphaia_in_Egina_-_Glyptothek_-_Munich_-_Germany_2017_(2).jpg (retrieved 13 September 2020).

References

  • Aristotle. 1998. Politics. Trans. C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett. Cited after the standard “Bekker” pagination indicated in most modern editions and translations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. 1781. Über den Bildungstrieb und das Zeugungsgeschäfte. Göttingen: Dieterich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Jean. 1992. On Sovereignty: Four Chapters from The Six Books of the Commonwealth. Ed. and Trans. Julian H. Franklin. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1965. Das System der Sittenlehre. In Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Sämtliche Werke, ed. Immanuel Hermann Fichte, vol. 4, 1–365. Berlin: De Gruyter. The pagination of this edition is indicated in most modern editions and translations of the work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1917. Eine Schwierigkeit der Psychoanalyse. Imago: Zeitschrift für Anwendung der Psychoanalyse auf die Geisteswissenschaften 5 (1): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2003. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Ed. Allen W. Wood and trans. H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. Leviathan. Ed. J.C.A. Gaskin. Oxford and New York. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature. A Critical Edition. Ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Wilhelm G. 1967. Trieb als sittliches Phänomen: Eine Untersuchung zur Grundlegung der Philosophie nach Kant und Fichte. Bonn: Bouvier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1900. Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Prussian Academy of Sciences and its successors. Berlin, later Berlin and Boston: Reimer, later De Gruyter. The pagination of this edition is indicated in most modern editions and translations of Kant’s works.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Vorlesungen zur Moralphilosophie. Ed. Werner Stark. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, Georg Christoph. 1967–1974. Schriften und Briefe. Ed. Wolfgang Promies, vol. 6. Munich: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 2003. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge, and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. Anne M. Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller and Harold Samuel Stone. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1997. Complete Works. Ed. John Cooper. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett. Cited after the standard “Stephanus” pagination indicated in most modern editions and translations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 2013. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold, Carl Leonhard. 1792. Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Göschen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thucydides. 2009. The Peloponnesian War. Trans. Martin Hammond. Introduction and Notes by P. J. Rhodes. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, Egbert. 2019. Bildungstrieb: Zur Karriere eines Konzepts zwischen 1780 und 1830. Hildesheim and New York: Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zöller, Günter. 2011. Between Rousseau and Freud. Kant on Cultural Uneasiness. In Rethinking Kant, ed. Oliver Thorndike, vol. 3, 52–77. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Freedom, Right, and Law: Fichte’s Late Political Philosophy. In The Bloomsbury Handbook to Fichte, ed. Marina F. Bykova, 261–275. London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi, and Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. ‘Participation of the People Through Its Deputies.’ Montesquieu, Kant and Hegel on German Freedom. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal (New School for Social Research) 42 (1) (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Günter Zöller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zöller, G. (2022). Equine Driving: Plato, Kant and Fichte on the Teamwork of the Mind. In: Kisner, M., Noller, J. (eds) The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84160-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics