Skip to main content
Log in

Soviet Philosophy Revisited – Why Joseph Bocheński Was Right While Being Wrong

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Josef Bocheński, pioneer of the discipline ofphilosophical sovietology and one of the firstto criticize Eurocentric attitudes, emphasizedthe central role of logic and sound argument inacademic philosophy. This helped him todemonstrate both the general flaws of and thedifferences in quality within Sovietphilosophy. His endeavors and results areindispensable for the yet-to-be-written historyof Soviet philosophy. By the same token, itmade him less perceptive of the centralpolitical, not just philosophical, role of thepartijnost'-principle. More recent developmentshave shown both Soviet philosophy andBocheński's own, Neo-Thomist position to bepart of a fundamentally outdated idea ofscientific philosophy. However, the criteria oflogical scrutiny and sound argument have notlost their force within globalizingphilosophical culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Zweerde, E. Soviet Philosophy Revisited – Why Joseph Bocheński Was Right While Being Wrong. Studies in East European Thought 55, 315–342 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025373328067

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025373328067

Navigation