Berkeley's pantheistic discourse

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (3):179-194 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Berkeley's immaterialism has more in common with views developed by Henry More, the mathematician Joseph Raphson, John Toland, and Jonathan Edwards than those of thinkers with whom he is commonly associated (e.g., Malebranche and Locke). The key for recognizing their similarities lies in appreciating how they understand St. Paul's remark that in God "we live and move and have our being" as an invitation to think to God as the space of discourse in which minds and ideas are identified. This way of speaking about God, adapted by Karl Barth and Paul Tillich, opens up new ways to think about the relation between God and finite minds.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,262 (#9,624)

6 months
158 (#21,538)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen H. Daniel
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

Can the Berkeleyan Idealist Resist Spinozist Panpsychism?Graham Clay & Michael Rauschenbach - 2021 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 24 (2):296-325.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ontological status of Malebranchean ideas.Monte Cook - 1998 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (4):525-544.
Berkeley and Malebranche on Ideas.Harry M. Bracken - 1963 - Modern Schoolman 41 (1):1-15.

Add more references