Errors Revisited in Light of the Balanced Contrast of Two Polarities in the First Chapter of Bhagavadgītā

Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 32 (3):335-357 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The 47 verses of the first chapter are divided equally by the 24th verse. The first 23 verses represent the individualist outlook of Duryodhana in the upbeat mood. In contrast, from verse 25 onwards, the upbeat mood gives way to despondency of downcast Arjuna, who starts lamenting the possible demise of people related to him by birth and alliances, and thereby demise of social order of clans and tribes based on relations of birth and alliance. Kṛṣṇa finds both the expectation of a social order based on modern individualist outlook as unjustified as the despondency at demise of tribes based on clannish and tribal outlook. The middle verse tells about the placing of the entire carriage discussion in the middle of the conflicting modern individualistic inclusive social order and the social order of clans and tribes. The middle position, advocated and elaborated in every detail in the entire Bhagavadgītā, is that of social formation based on institutions and practice of institutions. Vedavyāsa deliberately puts two consecutive erroneous statements in the mouth of Duryodhana and three consecutive errors in the mouth of Arjuna—errors of Duryodhana in I.10 and 11 and Arjuna’s errors in I.35, 36, and 37—to underline the error of outlook of each of them. The lately discovered errors of I.35 and I.37 are quite significant as these indicate that the theory of institution advocated in Bhagavadgītā is that of institution as a beehive. Vedavyāsa developed, without stating it explicitly, the beehive conception of institution as person, taking it over from śṛti and pañcarātra texts, without any beehive-like static stratification of the system of fourfold varṇa and without any essential involvement of static varṇa dharma rather developed it based on śāśvata dharma so that institution as person is ever manifesting with its changing forms in accordance with śāśvata dharma, which is different from varṇa dharma.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Significance of Three Errors in the First Chapter of Bhagavadgītā.Binod Kumar Agarwala - 2015 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 32 (1):19-30.
Varna – Jāti Interconnection: Some Reflections on Caste and Indian Tradition.Anil Kumar - 2015 - International Journal of Research in Social Sciences 5 (3):788-793.
Conflict and Attunement: The Limits of Punishment in Hegel's "Philosophy of Right".Erin Edward Flynn - 2002 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Varna -Jāti Interconnection: Revisiting Indian Caste System.Anil Kumar - 2015 - American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences 12 (2):246-251.
Reputation in a World of Errors and Corruption.Douglas Everitt Hill - 2004 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-28

Downloads
6 (#1,483,069)

6 months
1 (#1,514,069)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references