Testing Definitional Equivalence of Theories Via Automorphism Groups

Review of Symbolic Logic:1-22 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two first-order logic theories are definitionally equivalent if and only if there is a bijection between their model classes that preserves isomorphisms and ultraproducts (Theorem 2). This is a variant of a prior theorem of van Benthem and Pearce. In Example 2, uncountably many pairs of definitionally inequivalent theories are given such that their model categories are concretely isomorphic via bijections that preserve ultraproducts in the model categories up to isomorphism. Based on these results, we settle several conjectures of Barrett, Glymour and Halvorson.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Part 1: Theoretical equivalence in physics.James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):e12592.
Part 2: Theoretical equivalence in physics.James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):e12591.
Automorphism groups of differentially closed fields.Reinhold Konnerth - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 118 (1-2):1-60.
Bases for Structures and Theories II.Jeffrey Ketland - 2020 - Logica Universalis 14 (4):461-479.
A syntactic characterization of Morita equivalence.Dimitris Tsementzis - 2017 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (4):1181-1198.
Internality and interpretable automorphism groups in simple theories.Ziv Shami - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 129 (1-3):149-162.
Morita Equivalence.Thomas William Barrett & Hans Halvorson - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):556-582.
Bases for Structures and Theories I.Jeffrey Ketland - 2020 - Logica Universalis 14 (3):357-381.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-19

Downloads
18 (#819,350)

6 months
9 (#295,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Beyond Linguistic Interpretation in Theory Comparison.Toby Meadows - forthcoming - Review of Symbolic Logic:1-41.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
Morita Equivalence.Thomas William Barrett & Hans Halvorson - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):556-582.
What Was the Syntax‐Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About?Sebastian Lutz - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2):319-352.
What Do Symmetries Tell Us About Structure?Thomas William Barrett - 2017 - Philosophy of Science (4):617-639.

View all 14 references / Add more references