Rights and value in rescission : some implications for unjust enrichment

In Donal Nolan & Andrew Robertson (eds.), Rights and private law. Portland, Oregon: Hart (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unjust enrichment, rights and value.Ben McFarlane - 2012 - In Donal Nolan & Andrew Robertson (eds.), Rights and private law. Portland, Oregon: Hart.
Rights and private law.Donal Nolan & Andrew Robertson (eds.) - 2012 - Portland, Oregon: Hart.
Reconsidering the Role of Election in Rescission.Elise Bant - 2012 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (3):467-486.
Unjust Enrichment.Ernest J. Weinrib - 1996 - In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell. pp. 654–665.
The Unjust Enrichment Fallacy and Private Law.Peter Jaffey - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 26 (1):115-136.
Storytelling in the law of unjust enrichment.Tang Hang Wu - 2009 - In Andrew Robertson & Hang Wu Tang (eds.), The goals of private law. Portland, Or.: Hart.
Unjust factors and the restitutionary response.Chen-Wishart Mindy - 2000 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4):557-577.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references