Quality Peer review is essential for scholarly publishing

Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 3 (1):79-81 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

QUALITY PEER REVIEW IS ESSENTIAL FOR SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Peer review process in asia.Sakir Ahmed & Benzeeta Pinto - 2021 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 1 (2):136-141.
The ClarivateTM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review?Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib - 2017 - Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-11.
Motivating and Maintaining Ethics, Equity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Expertise in Peer Review.Adam Craig, Christina Lee, Nithyaa Bala & Carl Taswell - 2022 - Brainiacs Journal 3 (1):I5B147D9D.
Promoting F.A.I.T.h. In Peer review: Five core attributes of effective Peer review. [REVIEW]Leigh Turner - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review.Turner Leigh - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals.Maria Amuchastegui, Kean Birch & Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (4):670-697.
Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies.Vasiliki Mollaki - 2024 - Research Ethics 20 (2):239-250.
Predatory Publishing and Waste of Resource.Ilke Coskun Benlidayi - 2023 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 4 (3):176-178.
Unfamiliarity with Key Elements of Scholarly Writing and Research Impedes Ethical Publishing.Edward Barroga - 2023 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 4 (1):34-38.
Gordon Moran. Silencing Scientists and Scholars in Other Fields: Power, Paradigm Controls, Peer Review, and Scholarly Communication. xiv + 187 pp., bibl., indexes. Greenwich, Conn./London: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1998. [REVIEW]Rosemary Chalk - 2003 - Isis 94 (3):552-553.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references