Edward Gresham’s Astrostereon, or A Discourse of the Falling of the Planet (1603), the Copernican paradox, and the construction of early modern proto-scientific discourse

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82:44-56 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Edward Arthur Milne—The relations of mathematics to science.S. Rebsdorf & H. Kragh - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):51-64.
Reviewing Herschel's discourse.Richard Yeo - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (4):541-552.
Letting animals speak: Early modern scientific methods, speech, and the human/animal divide.Tawrin Baker - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 71:41-45.
Fundamentalism, antifundamentalism, and Gibbs' paradox.Valeria Mosini - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (2):151-162.
Fundamentalism, antifundamentalism, and Gibbs' paradox.Valeria Mosini - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (2):151-162.
Measurements, disturbances and the quantum three box paradox.O. J. E. Maroney - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 58:41-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-12

Downloads
12 (#1,095,929)

6 months
4 (#1,005,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references