Hybrid Answer Set Programming

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (1):134-163 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses an extension of Answer Set Programming called Hybrid Answer Set Programming which allows the user to reason about dynamical systems that exhibit both discrete and continuous aspects. The unique feature of Hybrid ASP is that it allows the use of ASP type rules as controls for when to apply algorithms to advance the system to the next position. That is, if the prerequisites of a rule are satisfied and the constraints of the rule are not violated, then the algorithm associated with the rule is invoked

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the relation between SPARQL1.1 and Answer Set Programming.Axel Polleres & Johannes Peter Wallner - 2013 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 23 (1-2):159-212.
Modelling ethical rules of lying with answer set programming.Jean-Gabriel Ganascia - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):39-47.
RASP and ASP as a fragment of linear logic.Stefania Costantini & Andrea Formisano - 2013 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 23 (1-2):49-74.
Foundations of the rule-based system ρLog.Mircea Marin & Temur Kutsia - 2006 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 16 (1-2):151-168.
From Felicitous Models to Answer Set Programming.Vladimir Lifschitz - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 79-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
14 (#993,104)

6 months
2 (#1,446,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming.Melvin Fitting - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):274-277.

Add more references