The Polarization of the Concepts Si (Private Interest) and Gong (Public Interest) in Early Chinese Thought

Asia Major 26 (2) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many scholars of early China agree that the fourth century bce witnessed a surge in intellectual interest in concepts that have been dubbed the self, “subjectivity,” the private realm, and the body. As such a sphere came into greater focus in intellectual circles, so did a new discourse that evaluated what it meant to benefit or deprive the self and its related parts. The famous statement purportedly by Yang Zhu 楊朱 (or Yangzi 楊子) that claims he was not willing to pluck out a single hair in order to benefit the world reminds us of such a discourse.2 Around the same time, there also emerged discussions that polarized various ideas of self and the private sphere (si 私), on the one hand, ver- sus the state and the public sphere (gong 公), on the other, especially in circles that concerned themselves with public policy and statecraft, but also more generally. These discussions formed a forceful counterpoint to the discourses involving human subjectivity and the body. Indeed, their open dislike of the influence of private, individual, and personal realms in politics strongly suggests that the statecraft writers were re- acting to and in dialog with those intellectuals who engaged discussion of subjectivity, the self, and its agencies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-13

Downloads
44 (#351,826)

6 months
44 (#106,754)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Public and private interests in Han Fei: A statist approach.Yutang Jin - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism.
Moral Concern in the Legalist State.Brandon King - 2020 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 19 (3):391-407.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references