Intellectual property and biotechnology: The U.s. Internal experience--part I

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (1):1-37 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: In the development of biotechnology in the United States, many questions were raised about the appropriateness of applying to this area a traditional robust system of intellectual property rights. Despite these hesitations, the U.S. rejected suggested modifications. This was a mistake, and there is a need to develop a modified system that promotes more of the relevant ethical values

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intellectual property and biotechnology: the European debate.Baruch B. Brody - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):69.
Traditional knowledge and intellectual property.Baruch A. Brody - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):231-249.
Intellectual property and biotechnology: The european debate.Baruch A. Brody - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):69-110.
The ethics of patenting human embryonic stem cells.Audrey R. Chapman - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (3):pp. 261-288.
Japan / US Comparisons of Biotechnology Patents.Miyako Okada-Takagi - 1996 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 6 (6):166-168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#212,917)

6 months
13 (#277,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Baruch Brody
PhD: Princeton University; Last affiliation: Rice University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references