The rhetoric of imperial righteousness in a post-9/11 world

Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (2):143-167 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the three US national security strategies released by Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama since 9/11. These national security strategies are required presidential statements describing US plans for national security. The authors analyze Bush’s two and Obama’s one post-9/11 national security strategies and evaluate the argumentative framework of imperial righteousness in the documents. The rhetoric of American imperial righteousness contains four themes: national security, the nature of the enemy, freedom and democracy, and American morality. While there are some differences between the documents, the authors argue that Bush and Obama both promoted the idea of imperial righteousness in their plans for American national security. Moreover, the four themes of imperial righteousness worked together effectively to advance America’s interests in world affairs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Letting Rhetoric Be: On Rhetoric and Rhetoricity.Christian O. Lundberg - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (2):247-255.
Justice as provisionality: An account of contrastive hard cases.Monica Mookherjee - 2001 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (3):67-100.
Aristotle.Ronald F. Duska - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (3):227-249.
Semi-post algebras.Nguyen Cat Ho & Helena Rasiowa - 1987 - Studia Logica 46 (2):149 - 160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
12 (#1,078,270)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references