Dependent Choices and Weak Compactness

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (4):568-573 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We work in set theory without the Axiom of Choice ZF. We prove that the Principle of Dependent Choices (DC) implies that the closed unit ball of a uniformly convex Banach space is weakly compact and, in particular, that the closed unit ball of a Hilbert space is weakly compact. These statements are not provable in ZF and the latter statement does not imply DC. Furthermore, DC does not imply that the closed unit ball of a reflexive space is weakly compact

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

James sequences and Dependent Choices.Marianne Morillon - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (2):171-186.
The Hahn-Banach Property and the Axiom of Choice.Juliette Dodu & Marianne Morillon - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (3):299-314.
Compact Metric Spaces and Weak Forms of the Axiom of Choice.E. Tachtsis & K. Keremedis - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (1):117-128.
Constructive compact operators on a Hilbert space.Hajime Ishihara - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):31-37.
Proof theory of weak compactness.Toshiyasu Arai - 2013 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 13 (1):1350003.
Some weak forms of the Baire category theorem.Kyriakos Kermedis - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (4):369.
Located sets and reverse mathematics.Mariagnese Giusto & Stephen G. Simpson - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1451-1480.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
27 (#609,703)

6 months
9 (#355,374)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Definability of measures and ultrafilters.David Pincus & Robert M. Solovay - 1977 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (2):179-190.

Add more references