Thinking about Conscience

Journal of Clinical Ethics 27 (3):251-253 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The path to consensus about physicians’ exercise of conscience was not linear. It looped back on itself as new insights illuminated earlier deliberations and in turn led to further insights. In particular, coming to agreement about physicians’ responsibility in regard to referral charted a route through many course corrections.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who Judges Harm?Nadia N. Sawicki - 2016 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 27 (3):238-242.
Conscience Rights and “Effective Referral” in Ontario.Carter Anne McGowan - 2018 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18 (2):255-268.
Conscience, referral, and physician assisted suicide.Kevin WM Wildes - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):323-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references