On the Strength of Ramsey's Theorem

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (4):570-582 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that, for every partition F of the pairs of natural numbers and for every set C, if C is not recursive in F then there is an infinite set H, such that H is homogeneous for F and C is not recursive in H. We conclude that the formal statement of Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs is not strong enough to prove , the comprehension scheme for arithmetical formulas, within the base theory , the comprehension scheme for recursive formulas. We also show that Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs is strong enough to prove some sentences in first order arithmetic which are not provable within . In particular, Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs is not conservative over for -sentences

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the strength of Ramsey's theorem without Σ1 -induction.Keita Yokoyama - 2013 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 59 (1-2):108-111.
Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs and Provably Recursive Functions.Alexander Kreuzer & Ulrich Kohlenbach - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (4):427-444.
Ramsey's Theorem and Cone Avoidance.Damir D. Dzhafarov & Carl G. Jockusch - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):557-578.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
69 (#242,601)

6 months
11 (#271,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

RT2 2 does not imply WKL0.Jiayi Liu - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (2):609-620.
Forcing in proof theory.Jeremy Avigad - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (3):305-333.
Ramsey's Theorem and Cone Avoidance.Damir D. Dzhafarov & Carl G. Jockusch - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):557-578.

View all 45 citations / Add more citations