Criminal investigation: A brief review of importance of biological evidence

Abstract

In any society, crime is ingrained in each social experience. All crimes are investigated within the legal framework, and the criminal justice system seeks to apprehend the perpetrator and compensate the victims based on evidence beyond a reasonable doubt and Criminal investigative evidence is critical in this process. The Prime intention of this study is to discuss the concepts of Biological evidence in Criminal Investigation and its Positive Impact on the criminal investigation procedure. Attention will also be drawn to the importance of the Biological evidence; secondary resources related to the criminal investigation field were reviewed for this article. As the concepts of the study, evidence, Locard’s exchange principle, circumstantial evidence, physical evidence, and biological evidence were classified; under biological evidence, 11 distinct types of evidence have been identified, including blood, semen, vaginal, secretion, saliva, urine, sweat, tears, faeces, nasal secretion and hair. Accordingly, Modern technology enables the identification of true perpetrators through the use of biological evidence discovered during a criminal investigation. The application of DNA analysis techniques has heightened the value of biological evidence. Biological evidence, in general, can be considered an important type of evidence in the modern criminal investigation process.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Recognition of inadmissibility of evidence obtained in the course of monitoring the commission of an offence in criminal proceeding in the field of official activities.Eugene Hladii - 2021 - Философия И Гуманитарные Науки В Информационном Обществе 11 (2):38-44.
Zheng ju fa jing yao =.Guifang Wang - 2015 - Beijing Shi: Fa lü chu ban she.
Fruit of the Poison Tree Doctrine in U.S. Criminal Proceedings and Regulations on the Exclusion of Evidence in Vietnamese Criminal Proceedings.Trinh Duy Thuyen - forthcoming - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-19.
Forensic DNA Typing.David Wasserman - 2002 - In Justine Burley & John Harris (eds.), A Companion to Genethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 349–363.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
2 (#1,823,102)

6 months
2 (#1,445,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references