Horace, Carm. 2, 12, 13: domina… Licymnia

Hermes 142 (4):494-498 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An important additional argument for the thesis that Licymnia is not one of Horace’s beloved girls but probably Maecenas’ wife, is the fact that Horace in his “Carmina”, unlike the elegiac poets, never uses domina to denote one of his girls.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The persona of licymnia: A revaluation of Horace, carm. 2. 12.Gregson Davis - 1975 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 119 (1-2):70-83.
Horace, Maecenas and Odes 2, 17.Emily Mcdermott - 1982 - Hermes 110 (2):211-228.
Horace in Love, Horace on Love.Giacomo Fedeli - 2023 - Classical Quarterly 73 (1):213-230.
Some ‘Central’ Thoughts on Horace's Odes.L. A. Moritz - 1968 - Classical Quarterly 18 (1):116-131.
Some 'Central' Thoughts on Horace's Odes.L. A. Moritz - 1968 - Classical Quarterly 18 (01):116-.
Late Horatian Lyric and the Virgilian Golden Age.Andreas T. Zanker - 2010 - American Journal of Philology 131 (3):495-516.
Sellar's Horace and the Elegiac Poets. [REVIEW]R. Y. Tyrrell - 1892 - The Classical Review 6 (5):221-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-23

Downloads
4 (#1,642,858)

6 months
2 (#1,445,320)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references