What are the ∀∑1b-consequences of T21 and T22?

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (1-2):79-88 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We formulate schemes and of the “typical” ∀∑ 1 b -sentences that are provable in T 2 1 , respectively T 2 2 . As an application, we reprove a recent result of Buss and Krajíček which describes witnesses for the ∀∑ 1 b -sentences provable in T 2 1 in terms of solutions to PLS-problems

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What are the ∀∑1 b-consequences of T 2 1 and T 2 2?Fernando Ferreira - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (1):79-88.
Bounded arithmetic and the polynomial hierarchy.Jan Krajíček, Pavel Pudlák & Gaisi Takeuti - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):143-153.
What are the∀∑1 b-consequences of T21 and T22?Fernando Ferreira - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (1):79-88.
The logic of arithmetical hierarchy.Giorgie Dzhaparidze - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 66 (2):89-112.
Exponentiation and second-order bounded arithmetic.Jan Krajíček - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 48 (3):261-276.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
11 (#1,145,893)

6 months
5 (#836,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Bounded arithmetic and the polynomial hierarchy.Jan Krajíček, Pavel Pudlák & Gaisi Takeuti - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):143-153.

Add more references