Social Theory After the Holocaust

Liverpool University Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In what has become a famous quotation, the philosopher Theodor Adorno commented that to write poetry "after Auschwitz" is barbaric. If the holocaust is an "event" that may legitimately be described as unspeakable, it is hard to see why poetry deserves more opprobrium than other ways of framing it, including what may broadly be called social theory. After all, if social theory were once guilty of ignoring the holocaust, it has also exhibited the barbarism of reason involved in transforming this "event" into social processes, conditions, systems, classificatory schemes and statistical tables. This collection of essays explores the character, impact and abiding legacy upon social theory of the Nazi holocaust. The premise which informs the contributions is that Zygmunt Bauman's claim that social theory has failed to address the holocaust remains true.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-13

Downloads
2 (#1,799,226)

6 months
1 (#1,472,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Charles Turner
University of Warwick
Robert Fine
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

In memoriam: Robert D. Fine (1945–2018).Daniel Chernilo - 2018 - European Journal of Social Theory 21 (4):574-576.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references