Cognitive Science 42 (2):712-717 (2018)

Abstract
Veksler and Gunzelmann argue that the vigilance decrement and the deleterious effects of sleep loss reflect functionally equivalent degradations in cognitive processing and performance. Our account is implemented in a cognitive architecture, where these factors produce breakdowns in goal-directed cognitive processing that we refer to as microlapses. Altmann raises a number of challenges to microlapses as a unified account of these deficits. Under scrutiny, however, the challenges do little to discredit the theory or conclusions in the original paper. In our response, we address the most serious challenges. In so doing, we provide additional support for the theory and mechanisms, and we highlight opportunities for extending their explanatory breadth.
Keywords Computational model  Fatigue  Sleep deprivation  Vigilance
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12588
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,467
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aftereffect of Sleep Deprivation.Robert T. Wilkinson - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (5):439-442.
Experiments on the Effects of the Loss of Sleep.H. R. Laslett - 1928 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 (5):370.
Antecedents of Sleep.Wilse B. Webb - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):162.
The Case Against Memory Consolidation in Rem Sleep.Robert P. Vertes & Kathleen E. Eastman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):867-876.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-01-19

Total views
16 ( #623,694 of 2,421,247 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,757 of 2,421,247 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes