We attempt to clarify divisions made by us in previous work (Colander et al., 2004a,b) between “orthodox, mainstream, and heterodox” in economics, following very useful remarks in Dequech (2007-08), whom we thank. We also provide specific advice for heterodox economists, namely: worry less about methodology, focus on being economists first and heterodox economists second, and prepare ideas to leave the incubator of heterodoxy to enter the mainstream economic debate
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How to Win Friends and (Possibly) Influence Mainstream Economists.Richard P. F. Holt & J. Barkley Rosser - unknown
Beyond the Positive–Normative Dichotomy: Some Remarks on Colander'sLost Art of Economics.Huei-Chun Su - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (4):375-390.
Explanatory Pluralism in Economics: Against the Mainstream?Bouwel Jeroen Van - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):299-315.
Rationalism and Mainstream Economics.Alex Viskovatoff - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):397-415.
Comparing Responses to Critical Realism.Siobhan Austen & Therese Jefferson - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (2):257-282.
Reorienting Economics: On Heterodox Economics, Themata and the Use of Mathematics in Economics.Tony Lawson - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):329-340.
Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate.Steve Fleetwood (ed.) - 1999 - Routledge.
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics.Harold Kincaid & Don Ross (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
'Heterodox Economics' and the Problems of Classification.Andrew Mearman - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (4):407-424.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads10 ( #430,780 of 2,168,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,816 of 2,168,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?