Implicit Proofs

Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):387 - 397 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We describe a general method how to construct from a propositional proof system P a possibly much stronger proof system iP. The system iP operates with exponentially long P-proofs described "implicitly" by polynomial size circuits. As an example we prove that proof system iEF, implicit EF, corresponds to bounded arithmetic theory $V_{2}^{1}$ and hence, in particular, polynomially simulates the quantified propositional calculus G and the $\pi_{1}^{b}-consequences$ of $S_{2}^{1}$ proved with one use of exponentiation. Furthermore, the soundness of iEF is not provable in $S_{2}^{1}$ . An iteration of the construction yields a proof system corresponding to $T_{2} + Exp$ and, in principle, to much stronger theories

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
46 (#95,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Quantified propositional calculi and fragments of bounded arithmetic.Jan Krajíček & Pavel Pudlák - 1990 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 36 (1):29-46.
Exponentiation and second-order bounded arithmetic.Jan Krajíček - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 48 (3):261-276.

Add more references