Two questions for private law theory

Jurisprudence 12 (3):391-416 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article claims that private law theorists ought to bear in mind the distinction between wholesale questions about the best interpretation or justification of legal institutions, and retail que...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liabilities in private law.Peter Jaffey - 2008 - Legal Theory 14 (4):233-255.
Property law.Jeremy Waldron - 1996 - In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell. pp. 7–28.
What can Kant Teach Us about Legal Classification?Jacob Weinrib - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (1):203-232.
Introduction.[author unknown] - 1996 - In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell. pp. 1-5.
Private Law and Justice.Sandy Steel - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (3):607-628.
The Normativity of Private Law.Stephen A. Smith - 2011 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2):215-242.
Experimental Jurisprudence.Kevin Tobia - 2022 - University of Chicago Law Review 89:735-802.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-07

Downloads
18 (#828,363)

6 months
8 (#505,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Felipe Jimenez
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.Charles Taylor - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):3 - 51.
Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.Charles Taylor - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):3-51.
The Fragmentation of Value.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references