Symposium: Is Psychical Research Relevant to Philosophy?

, &
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 24 (1):173-231 (1950)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/aristoteliansupp/24.1.173

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Symposium: Is Psychical Research Relevant to Philosophy?M. Kneale, R. Robinson & C. W. K. Mundle - 1950 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 24 (1):173-231.
Symposium: Is Psychical Research Relevant to Philosophy?M. Kneale, R. Robinson & C. W. K. Mundle - 1950 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 24 (1):173 - 231.
Popper K. R., Kneale William, and Ayer A. J.. Symposium: What can logic do for philosophy? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XXII, London 1948, pp. 141–178. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):290-290.
Symposium: The Relation between the Physical Nexus and the Psychical Nexus of Successive Generations.James Johnstone, Arthur Dendy, E. W. MacBride & C. Lloyd Morgan - 1924 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 4 (1):130 - 169.
Symposium: The Relation between the Physical Nexus and the Psychical Nexus of Successive Generations.James Johnstone, Arthur Dendy, E. W. Macbride & C. Lloyd Morgan - 1924 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 4:130-169.
Symposium: Is Anthropology Relevant to Ethics?L. J. Russell, J. D. Mabbott & A. M. Macbeath - 1946 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 20 (1):61-121.
Symposium: Is Anthropology Relevant to Ethics?L. J. Russell, J. D. Mabbott & A. M. Macbeath - 1946 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 20 (1):61 - 121.
Willard V. Quine. On what there is. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951, Appendix, 18 pp. unnumbered. [A reprint of XV 152.] - Peter Thomas Geach. Symposium: On what there is. I. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 125–136. - A. J. Ayer. Symposium: On what there is. II. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 137–148. - W. V. Quine. Symposium: On what there is. III. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 149–160. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (3):222-223.
Britton Karl, Urmson J. O., and Kneale W.. Are necessary truths true by convention? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XXI , pp. 78–133. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):201-202.
Ryle G.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 20–29.Lewy C.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 30–39.Popper K. R.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 40–60. [REVIEW]Albert A. Bennett - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (2):135-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The early work of Martha Kneale, née Hurst.Jane Heal - 2021 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (2):336-352.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references