Abstract

The correlation is analyzed between ideal, real, sensual objects and hyper objects in the new metaphysics. Postulated the need to replace the common objects by hyper-objects reffering to the events which take place in the globalized world. The actuality of learning the correlation of objects and hyper-objects in new metaphysics is explained by the necessity to show their real interaction based on refusal from dogmatic picture of the world. Mechanisms of dogmatism don’t work in the XXI century. New metaphysics is entirely absorbed into correlative interaction between ideal, real objects and hyper-objects. This problem is realised in contemporary philosophical trend – speculative realism, particularly, in the book by Graham Harman «Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects», in the article «On vicarious causation», and in the main work by Timothy Morton «Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World». Harman transforms the ideal objects of Husserl, who studies them in his «Logical Investigations», into sensitive objects and adds some new characteristics to them. The real objects, investigated by Heidegger in his book «The Origin of the Work of Art» are trasformed into tools by Harman with the help of Heidegger’s toolanalysis. At present the final chain of objects is ended by hyper-objects represented in new metaphysics of Morton. The subject of this investigation is new metaphysics oriented on objective relations. Object is the correlation of objects inside new metaphysics. Objective is to show the constitutive aspects of new metaphysics as the project of liberating from classical dogmatism. Thus, constitutive aspects of new metaphysics as the project of liberating from classical dogmatism are found in correlative interaction of objects originated in classical picture of world and objects evolutioned in the artifacts of new rationality or hyper-objects. These sensitive objects or the ideal ones, which were classified in intentional subjectivity at the beginning of the XX century, are investigated in philosophy of intersubjectivity of Husserl and in conception of sensitive objects of Harman. On the other hand Heidegger’s teaching on real objects contradicts to these ideas. Real and ideal objects don’t work against each other, more than that they complement each other. Such interaction of objects lead to a new paradigm of relations shown in object-oriented philosophy of Harman. The globalization of modern philosophy stresses on the idea that we cannnot contemplate on objects without paying attention to the arising of new phenomenon in new metaphysics – the phenomenon of hyper-objects.