Word embeddings reveal growing moral concern for people, animals, and the environment

British Journal of Social Psychology (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Enlightenment idea of historical moral progress asserts that civil societies become more moral over time. This is often understood as an expanding moral circle and is argued to be tightly linked with language use, with some suggesting that shifts in how we express concern for others can be considered an important indicator of moral progress. Our research explores these notions by examining historical trends in natural language use during the 19th and 20th centuries. We found that the associations between words denoting moral concern and words referring to people, animals, and the environment grew stronger over time. The findings support widely-held views about the nature of moral progress by showing that language has changed in a way that reflects greater concern for others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vegetarianism.Mylan Engel - 2016 - Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics.
‘Removing the Barriers’: Mary Midgley on Concern for Animals.David E. Cooper - 2020 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 87:249-262.
Recognizing the intrinsic value of animals: beyond animal welfare.Marcel Dol (ed.) - 1999 - Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
Rejecting Empathy for Animal Ethics.T. J. Kasperbauer - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):817-833.
A Test of ‘Utilitarianism for Animals, Kantianism for People’.David Wendler - 2021 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 18 (5):473-499.
The Carnivore Strikes Back.L. W. Sumner - 1984 - Dialogue 23 (4):661-668.
Anthropocentric Indirect Arguments and Anthropocentric Moral Attitudes.Duncan Purves - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (3):267-270.
The Lives of Animals.Jean Kazez - 2010-01-08 - In Michael Boylan (ed.), Animalkind. Blackwell. pp. 79–99.
Speciesism and moral status.Peter Singer - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):567-581.
Why Can Computers Understand Natural Language?Juan Luis Gastaldi - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (1):149-214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-20

Downloads
1 (#1,911,041)

6 months
1 (#1,512,999)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references